The four types are: Community participation with an emphasis on community growth or community building. Participation from the Community in consultation and decision-making. Community participation that helps groups, corporations, etc. enhance their delivery of services or achieve their objectives
There is no difference. Isis and Isil are the same terrorist group.
Answer:
someone already asked the same question but here you go
Answer:
Confucian doctrine or Confusionism
Explanation:
Confusionism considers that society institutions are family, school, and state; therefore its priests are not separate liturgical specialists, but parents, teachers, and officials.
Confusionism not only focuses in institutions but also has another important concept: humaneness (ren). Ren is translated as love or kindness and it's considered the source of all virtues.
Mixing these two ideas we can see the general idea that Confusionism has of a family: It has a high ideal for family interaction where members are supposed to treat each other with love, respect, and consideration for the needs of all. At the same time, and since family is one of the most important society institutions it must have an strict and firm control on their members.
Therefore, we can see that the answer to the question is Confucian doctrine or Confusianism since it blends parental love within the family with strict and firm control.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
