The art of rhetoric helps reveal a moral distinction between leadership and Authocratic governing
<h3>What is the art of rhetoric?</h3>
Rhetoric deals with persuading an individual or group of people in a logical way.
This can be done with a speech that is persuasive and it can also be done with some element of history.
A leader uses a persuasive speech and not an authocratic Individual.
An authocratic individual is authoritative in nature with no persuasive approach when addressing people.
He speaks and what and people to do as he bids them.
Therefore,
The art of rhetoric helps reveal a moral distinction between leadership and Authocratic governing
Learn more on leader below
brainly.com/question/1232764
#SPJ1
Good Morning!
There were several transformations in the transition from the 19th to the 20th centuries. These included advances in medicine, architecture and basic sanitation, which ensured that quality of life not only improved but was maintained. All this adds up to the rise of the fastest and most efficient means of transport, which has allowed longer distances to be covered in less time.
Hugs!
What does the question say?
Answer:
Metaethical relativism is a concept that explains that moral judgments are relative to a particular condition or standpoint and can not be true or false in a complete sense. So scientists believe in some sort of beliefs, influence, customs and that makes the judgment that is relative to a particular standpoint.
Metaethical objectivism is free from a particular standpoint and completely based on one moral ground or principle. Here mathematical relativism focuses on ethical judgment.
Situation relativism is a concept or approach that based on relative situations and mindset rather than legalistic approaches. Therefore, there is no word like perfect or never in this approach.
Situation absolutism is totally based on ethics and principle irrespective of situation or condition and focus only on what is right or wrong.