According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.
Good questions to ask are
- How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
- Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
- What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?
<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>
Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.
In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.
Read more about oral arguments
brainly.com/question/15266611
#SPJ1
Answer:
Philadelphia was pulled off by her captors and taken to Tripoli harbor, where she represented not just a humiliating defeat, but also a potentially serious threat to American warships and commercial shipping in the Mediterranean sea.
Explanation:
From the 1820s through the 1850s American governmental issues moved toward becoming in one sense more just, in another more prohibitive, and, by and large, more divided and all the more adequately controlled by national gatherings. Since the 1790s, legislative issues turned out to be more majority rule as one state after another finished property capabilities for voting. Legislative issues turned out to be more prohibitive as one state after another formally rejected African Americans from the suffrage. By 1840, every white man could vote in everything except three states (Rhode Island, Virginia, and Louisiana), while African Americans were prohibited from voting in everything except five states and ladies were disfranchised all over the place. In the meantime, political pioneers in a few states started to restore the two-party strife that had been the standard amid the political battles between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans (1793– 1815). Gatherings and gathering struggle wound up plainly national with Andrew Jackson's crusade for the administration in 1828 and have remained so from that point forward. Gatherings named possibility for each elective post from fence watcher to president and battled valiantly to get them chose.
Answer:
I think it was the totally hair Barbie.
