Your question is incomplete, so I would have to give you a general overview to enable you get to the right answer.
The writer should logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
When a writer is trying to include a research into his essay, this is a supporting evidence that is used to <u>validate a claim.</u>
<u />
With this in mind, we should know that the author is trying to <u>back up a claim</u> he has already previously made.
For example, if an author is trying to make a point about dangers of bush burning, after he had made a claim that bush burning can worsen the ozone layer (for example), then he would bring evidence which shows how much the ozone layer has deteriorated after series of bush burning over the years
With this in mind, a writer would logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
Read more here
brainly.com/question/21608125
Answer:
A machine that can help people with PTSD and help them calm thair nerves and get rid of thair PTSD.
It would look like a light bar that customizes trucks. It has blue or turquoise lights that slowley play back and forth. A therpist would ask qusitions that first focous on what they had PTSD from and then they would ask nice calm qusitions that would be like what do you enjoy doing. If it works right then people would loose thair PTSD resultng in less deaths per year.
It can be proven using objective evidence
Answer:
They provide false reasons in support of a claim, making the writer seem less credible.
Explanation:
The use of fallacy is using faulty arguments to support the opinion. At the first glance, the fallacious opinion can seem better than it is, but it is not supported by facts, and the reader can have the feeling the writer is dishonest.
By using fallacies, the writer is discrediting his work and words.
