Answer: Don't copy from other websites. Explain clearly everything. Show the calculation u made. Highlight important points(write in bold maybe?). Avoid spelling mistakes. If u r unsure of the question then simply just don't answer it. Use easy language for people to understand ur explanation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Making the assumption that these people were prejudiced or racist is an example of the correspondence bias.
Explanation: On December 1st, 1955, Rosa Parks was commuting back home by bus, when the driver asked her and three other African Americans to stand up from their seats so that white passengers could seat there. While the three other passengers complied with the driver's order, Rosa Parks denied to do so, which ended up with her arrest, and later on with a social movement that decided to boycott the buses in Montgomery during Rosa Parks' trial. Although most of the people decided to leave the first seat behind the driver empty in honor of Rosa Parks, some of them actually seat on it anyways. Assuming that these people were racists is an example of a correspondence bias. A correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's personality based on a unique and specific observed behavior.There are many circumstances and reasons as to why that people sat on the seat that was meant to be empty that would not make them instantly perceived as racist or prejudiced, but assuming that they are based on that one action would be an example of a correspondence bias.
Answer:
<u>The Judicial Branch</u>
Explanation:
Article III of the US Constitution describes the main structure, function, and responsibility of the Judicial Branch, which, according to the article, shall consist of one Supreme Court and others inferior courts which shall be ordained by Congress. It also grants this branch the power to resolve disputes between two or more states and between states and the federal government, to evaluate the Constitution and to review laws enacted by Congress.
Answer:
Scarr
Explanation:
Under her theory, Scarr proposes that the major part of variations in intelligence and other differences in individuals finally come from genetics, even though there is no actual genetic basis to confirm this. This is because Scarr thinks that we are the creators of our environment, and this environment results from our inherent characteristics. To explain this, she proposed three main aspects of the theory: gene-environment correlations, the evocation of responses, and choice of environment.
