1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
10

"first lie, then​ deny" would be consistent with which approach to social​ responsibility?

Social Studies
2 answers:
zmey [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Obstructionist stance.

Explanation:

The social responsibility of the organization is the obligation of an organization to act in a way that serves both its own interests and the interests of society.

Organizations do not yet have a definite and unique stance on social responsibility, so there are four different approaches to social responsibility, which are: Obstructionist, Defensive, Accommodative, and Proactive.

The phrase "First lie, then deny" fits the standards advocated by the obstructionist approach, as this approach demonstrates a denial of social responsibility and prioritizes the organization's economic activities.  That is, this approach states that when it comes to corporate social responsibility with a society, you must first lie and then deny any responsibility.

Jlenok [28]3 years ago
4 0
There are various general approaches to social responsibilities and can be devided into four basic stances: Obstructionist, Defensive, Accommodative, and Proactive (Amanda, 2008).   “First lie, then deny” would be consistent with the Obstructionist stance approach. It is to hinder or get in the way of, or stop something. An organization which holds an obstructionist stance “tries to block and stop what is going on” and avoid corporate social responsibility (Steege, 2008, Slide 9). They do not make social responsibility an effort, instead making profits the most important aspect of its business. Obstructive businesses viewed as immoral by some people since they may pollute natural lands, abuse their employees or cheat customers.

You might be interested in
How did poor intellectual property laws benefit the United States during the Industrial Revolution?
lara31 [8.8K]

International piracy of intellectual property rights has emerged as one of the most important foreign policy issues for many industrialized countries, particularly the United States. U.S. companies have suffered greatly from the lack of rigorous and uniform international standards for intellectual property rights. The absence of intellectual property laws in developing countries costs U.S. firms one dollar for every three dollars of revenue gained from exported products, PhRMA, Opportunities and Challenges for Pharmaceutical Innovation 3 (1996), while inadequate international enforcement of existing laws is estimated to cost U.S. industry up to $80 billion per year. Report of the United States Trade Representative's Intergovernmental Policy Advisory Committee (IGPAC) to the Congress of the United States on the Agreements Reached in the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 22 (1994).


4 0
3 years ago
The question is in the picture you have to be 100% percent right.
madreJ [45]

Answer:

the correct answer is relative

7 0
2 years ago
How did reunification impact Germany's economy? Group of answer choices Reunification cause East Germany's economy to experience
Lisa [10]
It’s a I just done the same thing and I looked at the awncer
8 0
2 years ago
Pls help me <br><br> Do you think China is rich in natural resources? Explain your answer.
Fofino [41]

Answer:

yess

Explanation:

China has extensive deposits of coal, oil and natural gas. Besides these fossil fuels, China is a top producer of aluminum, magnesium, antimony, salt, talc, barite, cement, coal, fluorspar, gold, graphite, iron, steel, lead, mercury, molybdenum, phosphate rock, rare earths, tin, tungsten, bismuth and zinc.

5 0
2 years ago
What are the three constitutional qualifications to be a member of the house of representatives
Luda [366]

Answer: be at least 25 years old, been a US citizen for at least 7 years, live in the state in which they are elected

Explanation:Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for representatives. Each representative must (1) be at least twenty-five years old, (2) have been a citizen of the United States for the past seven years, and (3) be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state they represent.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • M completes an application for life insurance but does not pay the initial premium. all of these actions must occur before m's p
    6·1 answer
  • In Canada, who MOST determines how goods and services will be made
    5·2 answers
  • Which person best illustrates opportunities for upward social mobility in the United States?a. First-shift factory workerb. Firs
    7·1 answer
  • Exam Guidelines
    5·1 answer
  • What’s a pair for a grayback in the civil war
    6·1 answer
  • When false statements damage a person's reputation?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement about the 1896 election is FALSE? a. The Populist Party declined after the election. b. The election is consider
    6·1 answer
  • Which form of listening occurs when you are trying to experience what another person is thinking or feeling?
    14·2 answers
  • How do you think the students greg fights with feel
    13·1 answer
  • The predicate of a sentence is
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!