1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
10

"first lie, then​ deny" would be consistent with which approach to social​ responsibility?

Social Studies
2 answers:
zmey [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Obstructionist stance.

Explanation:

The social responsibility of the organization is the obligation of an organization to act in a way that serves both its own interests and the interests of society.

Organizations do not yet have a definite and unique stance on social responsibility, so there are four different approaches to social responsibility, which are: Obstructionist, Defensive, Accommodative, and Proactive.

The phrase "First lie, then deny" fits the standards advocated by the obstructionist approach, as this approach demonstrates a denial of social responsibility and prioritizes the organization's economic activities.  That is, this approach states that when it comes to corporate social responsibility with a society, you must first lie and then deny any responsibility.

Jlenok [28]3 years ago
4 0
There are various general approaches to social responsibilities and can be devided into four basic stances: Obstructionist, Defensive, Accommodative, and Proactive (Amanda, 2008).   “First lie, then deny” would be consistent with the Obstructionist stance approach. It is to hinder or get in the way of, or stop something. An organization which holds an obstructionist stance “tries to block and stop what is going on” and avoid corporate social responsibility (Steege, 2008, Slide 9). They do not make social responsibility an effort, instead making profits the most important aspect of its business. Obstructive businesses viewed as immoral by some people since they may pollute natural lands, abuse their employees or cheat customers.

You might be interested in
For the past week, Christopher has been studying for his first American History exam. Christopher plans to transfer and eventual
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

He might not have done this things

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The concept of karma is best described as
diamong [38]
Uhhh something like, what goes around comes around? or do good, get good. hope this helps, have an amazing day :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How much of the railroads were destroyed in the South as a result of the Civil War?
frozen [14]

 When discussing railroads during the Civil War their role is often overlooked. However, they were an incredibly vital and important vehicle in the movement of troops and materiel that ultimately enabled the Union to win the conflict.  After fighting broke out between  in 1861 the country had a rail network stretching over 30,000 miles. Unfortunately, the South was at an immediate disadvantage in this regard; 21,300 miles (in conjunction with 45,000 miles of telegraph wire), or about 70%, was concentrated in the Northeast and Midwest leaving the Confederacy with only 9,022 miles (and 5,000 miles of telegraph wire).  The South did have one important advantage here, much of its trackage was brand new at the start of the war.  As William Thomas points out in his book, "The Iron Way: Railroads, The Civil War, And The Making Of Modern America<span>," 75% of its lines were built in the 1850s.  Even by the mid-19th century railroads understood the need for heavier rail, reinforced bridges, and durable rights-of-way to handle ever-increasing tonnage.  After new routes had been finished they were nearly always rebuilt, sometimes almost immediately, for this purpose.</span>During the war's entire four year history the Confederacy was able to inflict more than $2.5 million in damages to Northern rail lines (over $35 million in today's dollars).

Hope I helped :)


6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In attempting to find and purchase high-quality cosmetics, Megan reminds herself that the most expensive brands are the best. Me
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:A heuristic

Explanation:

A heuristic technique is the way in which we use a short cut to solve a problem or to make a decision by using practical reasoning which may not be logical or rational but still which is sufficient for us to make a quick decision or resolve an issues immediately or reach a short term goal. It helps us find a satisfying solution as quickly as possible.bit take away all the process of having to think deep. Heuristic can be a trial and error or an educated guess or using Intuition or just plainly common sense.

7 0
4 years ago
Air is a gas. Gas fills its container.
andrew-mc [135]
I dont think gas fits a container it doesnt take its shape its a gas
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Consider the observation that many school shootings have been perpetrated by people with a history of playing violent video game
    15·1 answer
  • Family and Economic Trends in Canada
    10·1 answer
  • What was the Circus Maximus' importance to the development of Ancient Rome?
    13·1 answer
  • Under Catherine the Great, what items expanded or improved?
    5·1 answer
  • Which factor most directly resulted in great britain entering
    15·1 answer
  • How are school districts different from special districts? Check all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • What power do culture and tradition have in the persistence of bride kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan and or Kazakhstan?
    14·1 answer
  • In choosing a career, your personal resources are defined as _____.
    15·1 answer
  • Which action is an example of participating in politics? (1 point)
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the process of coastal upwelling. why is an abundance of marine life associated with these areas?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!