Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Correct answer Is, B. an enemy of England .
The process by which new information displaces older information in short-term memory could explain why someone, for example, could remember a phone number and suddenly he or she will forget the last three digits of the number. In order to avoid this, we can enhance our short-term memory skill by chunking or having a rehearsal.
Design your survey carefully; use well-trained staff and proven techniques.
Develop a relationship with respondents. ...
Send reminders to respond.
Offer incentives to respond.
Keep surveys short.
Brainliest?
The Hammurabi code was appropriate for checking the impunity of that era, where the poor and the weak lived at the mercy of the strong and wealthy.Some aspects however are no longer applicable with the modern conception of justice and fairness. For example,binding creditors to sell their wives and children to repay their debts is no longer practical but also cruel.
