Answer:
True
Explanation:
Magna Carter was agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede in 1215.
The Magna Carta involves every individual regardless of class, position as being answerable to the laws of the land. No one is above the law including the Kings and Presidents.
The most famous clause gave all men the right to justice and a fair trial. Both the elites and common people are to be treated the same way.
Scientists got information for <span> the </span>geologic time scale<span> by studying rock layers and index fossils worldwide.With this </span>information<span>, </span>scientists<span> placed Earth's rock layers in order by relative age. Later, radioactive dating helped determine the absolute age of the divisions in the </span>geologic time scale<span>.</span>
Yes he was, he was justified because article two grants him authority to issue executive order.
1) The Wilmot Proviso was an unsuccessful 1846 proposal in the United States Congress to ban slavery in territory acquired from Mexico in the Mexican–American War. The conflict over the Wilmot Proviso was one of the major events leading to the American Civil War.
In short, A proposed law that would have banned slavery from lands gained as a result of the Mexican-American War.
2) The main issues were:
- California applying for statehood.
- Slave trade would be banned in the District of Columbia.
- Creation of fugitive slave law.
3) The status of new western territories would be decided by popular sovereignty, which <u>where the people would vote over issues rather than having the representatives</u><u>.</u>
4) Seven.
- Basic American ideals of self-determination as manifested in the Declaration of Independence guided the Southerners toward secession and in their mind justified them in the act.
- Released from Northern assaults on its "peculiar institution" of slavery, the South was confident that it would do much better as a separate nation.
<u>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━</u>
Answer:
No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay with greater reason, a body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same time; yet what are many of the most important acts of legislation, but so many judicial determinations, not indeed concerning the rights of single persons, but concerning the rights of large bodies of citizens? And what are the different classes of legislators but advocates and parties to the causes which they determine?
Explanation:
