<span>B.Citizens who controlled local productivity found it difficult to compete in a global market, which led to many unused goods.
this is the closest of the 4
not A because: they still found a way to transport everything, (using rails and the like) and they wouldn't really be making nuclear weapons at that quick of a rate if their transportation was down.
not C because: Sure, economic control was concentrated at the top, however, they did encourage technology (but only in the military and the like) So productivity was focused on military. Even if they produced things the general population can use, the military took a chunk out of it (that lead to shortages)
not D because: the lands that the USSR was located in was pretty rich in mineral wealth and the like. They could mine out the minerals and use them (which beats down the "lack of resources" part.) Also, their population was the largest in the world (considering it had a bunch of countries together as one) and so there really wasn't a shortage of labor ( i mean, their army was also the largest in the world too...) This meant that they had more than enough people to be employed in the workforce, they just didn't use them wisely
hope this helps</span>
Technology and new discoveries caused cities and towns to develop. <span />
Pretty much just Give the Owner a part of the harvest or money that was created.
Answer:
Most colonies in the south of the US had a suitable farming climate, as well as warm - hot weather, which allowed for a large range of crops to be grown, from cash crops (tobacco, cotton, etc.) to edibles. Most essentially owned pieces of lands to farm on.
~
