Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
Slightly above their costs in the long run.
Explanation: The monopolistic competitive firms are those who produce the similar products and service but without perfect substitute. The monopolistic firms are closely related with the business strategy of brand differentiation. Basically, the monopolistic competition is the combine of monopoly and perfect market. The monopolistic competition don't have the the power to control the market price like the monopoly system.
When the profit matter comes to the business, the monopolistic firms earn profits slightly above their costs in the long run. Because barriers to entry are low, other firms have an incentive to enter the market, increasing the competition. As a result to survive in the market the profit margin gets lower. Therefore, they just make the profit above their costs.
Answer:
They developed many new techniques for buildings and construction of all types including the invention of concrete, Roman roads, the invention of Roman arches, and incredibly well built aqueducts that ran for miles before they reached the end and delivered fresh water.
Answer:
As such, history provides an excellent example of how biases change, evolve, and even ... history an empirical, objective discipline (most notably by Voltaire) did not find ... It may also be used to describe a view centered on the history or eminence of ... by a refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view.
Explanation:
Explanation:
In December 1917, Germany agreed to an armistice and peace talks with Russia, and Lenin sent Leon Trotsky to Brest-Litovsk in Belarus to negotiate a treaty. The talks broke off after Germany demanded independence for Russian holdings in Eastern Europe, and in February 1918 fighting resumed on the eastern front.
Thi question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.
The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.
Answer: intermediate scrutiny
Explanation:
In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.
The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.
DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn´t pass that test.
