Answer:
B) production and distribution costs fall with accumulated production experience
Explanation:
A low price may slow down market growth. However, it cannot occur in the market penetration strategy because a market penetration strategy lowers the price to attract customers in a discouraging competitive market. Therefore, option "A" and option "E" is incorrect. As the penetration strategy offers a lower price, therefore, the higher price is nowhere near the option, so "C" is not correct. As the price is low, customers want to buy more, and it is not an inelastic demand. Therefore, the option "D" is wrong also.
As penetration strategy produces the products at a lower price, they can offer low selling prices. It can only happen due to the higher production experience. So, <em>"B"</em> is the right choice.
<span>The correct answer is Monetary Policy. Monteray policies are made by institutions like central banks with the goal of adjusting or fighting inflation and deflation rates. Fiscal policies would be policies about public spending or about imports and exports and would be made by the congress and not by the central bank.</span>
Answer:
c. Unique costing. Job order costing.
Explanation:
Doing work on the specific requirement of customer is classified in unique costing and job order costing. Because all specifications , time period and requirements of the job is different from each other. All the other options are related to a similar business operations which require same costing method to be accounted for.
If I remember correctly, it would be "<u>Gross Domestic Product</u>"
Answer:
C) Paying a bribe to a company executive in order to be awarded a contract.
Explanation:
Not only politicians or public officials are corrupt, in order for corruption to exist, there must be some private party willing to give a public servant something in exchange for an illegal favor.
During the past few years a huge corruption scandal was uncovered in Brazil, called the lavajato (car wash in English). The most important result was not only the billions of dollars recovered from public servants and politicians, but the fact that the owners and upper management of virtually all the largest Brazilian corporations were sent to jail as accomplices. It is not common that the richest people in a country are sent to jail.
