1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tju [1.3M]
2 years ago
9

Which of the following was built as a temple in ancient Mesopotamia?

History
2 answers:
JulijaS [17]2 years ago
7 0
D. Ziggurat

The Ziggurats were built by ancient Sumerians, Akkadians, Elamites, Eblaites, and Babylonians for religious reasons.
natta225 [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: D

Explanation: I’m not sure what the first one is, but B is from Egypt, C is from Greece (im pretty sure)

You might be interested in
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which of the following are the key components of the concept of “normalization”?
Mice21 [21]

B. acceptance of people with disabilities

C. access to the same conditions of life as people without disabilities

are the correct answers.

4 0
3 years ago
What specigiv political reforms did napoleon introduce?
Iteru [2.4K]
<span>Napoleon Bonaparte's biggest reform and influence was the Napoleonic Code. This code forbade privileges based on birth, gave the people freedom of religion and stated that government jobs should be awarded to the most qualified person. The code was not well liked among countries surrounding France at its time of implementation.</span>
4 0
2 years ago
What happened in 1890 concerning civil rights?
Flauer [41]
<span>In 1890, twenty states passed laws that enacted segregation laws. This happened because of the Southern states. The Southern states were not accepting the terms given to the states by the Reconstruction after the Civil War. One example was Florida, they made a law saying whites and blacks will never be able to marry. In Georgia, a white business owner could refuse to serve a black person. <u>The correct answer is C.</u></span>
8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following explains a continuity in the effect of technological innovation on the production of goods in the late 18
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

The correct response is Option D: New industrial machines increased the number of goods that factories could make.

Explanation:

After the Civil War, the United States grew rapidly and quickly became an industrial nation. This growth was fueled by : Innovations in technology, and the development of large-scale agriculture, and the federal government itself expanded. There was also tensions regarding immigration and federal Indian policy and the late 1800s there was increased demands for workers and women rights. Many inventions in the late 1880s helped to fuel the growth of cities. Thomas Edison’s invention of the electric light bulb made it more practical to light factories and homes and extended the workday as it allowed people to work and accomplish things at night as well.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were US soldiers who fought in WWI called?
    9·1 answer
  • The first Europeans to settle the area that is now New York were
    13·2 answers
  • Look at the map, which feature does the highlighted area on the map show?
    8·2 answers
  • The Indian Removal Act of 1830 authorized the removal of American Indians
    7·2 answers
  • How did the caltholic church respond to the Protestant reformation
    9·1 answer
  • What of democracy as well as what of capitalism?
    9·2 answers
  • What brought people's awareness to the plight of the jews??
    14·1 answer
  • 6. Who was the conquistador that conquered the Aztec empire and who helped him?​
    10·2 answers
  • How did Confucius believe that kings should behave?
    15·2 answers
  • Greek myths describe an early civilization that developed:.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!