The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:
<h3>What is Brinkmanship?</h3>
Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.
This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.
The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'
However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.
Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
To learn more about Brinkmanship, refer:
brainly.com/question/807188
But what What is it that I answer
Answer:
los conflicos del medio oriente son:
Syrian Cival War in Lebanon from 2011 to 2017
Iran-Saudi Arabia proxy conflict in 2011
Iraqi Cival War from 2014 to 2017
Yemeni Cival War in 2015
Explanation:
If im correct the answer should be Submarines and mines were an inexpensive and better way to engage battleships. I hope this helps. let me know if it doesnt
Answer: I am pretty sure it was the Eastern front. I hope this helps.
