1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gekata [30.6K]
3 years ago
6

I. Submarines and mines were an inexpensive and better way to engage battleships II. Convoys proved to be the most effective def

ense against submarines III. The British navy dominated the world’s oceans through its use of submarine warfare IV. Great sea battles between surface ships were rare during the war Which statements are TRUE about warfare at sea in World War I?
History
2 answers:
Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago
4 0
If im correct the answer should be Submarines and mines were an inexpensive and better way to engage battleships. I hope this helps. let me know if it doesnt

Eva8 [605]3 years ago
4 0

IV      GREAT SEA BATTLES BETWEEN SURFACE SHIPS WERE RARE DURING THE WAR

You might be interested in
Important changes in global trade in the 1990s were made by _____________. a. NAFTA and WTO. c. WTO and OPEC. b. NAFTA and OPEC.
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

the answer is d

Explanation:

i just took the test

5 0
3 years ago
What was the biggest weakness of the articles of confederation?
cluponka [151]
The National Government could not force the states to obey it's laws.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the work which speaks of the peoples right to select and remover rulers entiled the tenure of kings and magistrates​
kogti [31]

Answer:

That's true the work which speaks of the people's right to select and remover rulers entitled the tenure of kings and magistrates​

so the answer would be B because its the closest to the answer it can get

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How long has fidel castro been ruling cuba?
Mice21 [21]
He ruled for 50 years. He died however about a year ago after a heart attack at the age of 90.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the difference between the civil rights acts of 1957 and the civil rights act of 1964
zvonat [6]

The civil rights act of 1957 was focused primarily on protecting civil rights, however the civil rights act of 1964 was focused primarily on the outlawing of discrimination based upon race, color, religion, sex, sex or national origin.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The first plan of government used by the United States was under the:
    15·2 answers
  • How much earlier than the US did Britain abolish slavery?
    15·2 answers
  • In which case did the Supreme Court rule that Congress had the sole power to regulate interstate commerce?
    9·2 answers
  • Who was Bartolome de las casas? How did his experience in America shape his view of native Americans and what did he do about it
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the Dutch monk and scholar who criticized the folly of his fellow man in his book, The Praise of Folly?
    14·1 answer
  • Johnson's impeachment trial was held after he violated the:
    14·1 answer
  • How did the economy in the South encourage a dependence on slavery that the economy in the North did not?
    10·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!! I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLYEST!! <br><br> How would you describe the Compromise of 1850?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the Louisiana Purchase?
    11·1 answer
  • We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain una
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!