Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
The Europeans in the 16th century used the term <u>"New World"</u> to describe the land "discovered" between Europe and Asia. Amerigo Vespucci coined the term "New World" or "Mundus Novus" in latin, Vespucci had the hypothesis that the lands discovered by Christopher Columbus to the west were not the edges of Asia, but a completely different continent, which he called "New World".
Answer:
"Austin feels depressed all the time..."
The psychologist believes that Austin engages in too much ____introspection______ and __attribution____.
Explanation:
Introspection: This is a situation that explains why Austin engages in inward reflection of his actions and behaviors and condemns himself as worthless. Should he spare some thoughts, he would have realized that he was only a mortal, imperfect, and subject to the vagaries of life. He would have realized that he is not at the centre of the world, but God is. He is paying too much attention to what he does and how he behaves, instead of accepting his limitations as a human being, created for love and to love. He should not spend too much time dwelling on his mistakes. He can take a break and enjoy what life offers him. In this way, he would develop gratitude, which is missing in his current psychological reflections.
Attribution is the process that has enabled Austin to assign causes to his actions and behaviors. This is why he is depressed. Because, he is overdoing it, it has allowed fear to rule his life, instead of faith in God, the Father. He might think that some outside forces are driving his life. He should properly resume control and be in the driver's seat. He should articulate what he wants to achieve in life and pursue his purpose, mindful of the fact that there is a higher power (God), who must be glorified and praised at all times. By changing the way he attributes his actions and behaviors to give thanks instead, Austin's depression will become a thing of past, and it will get to full-blown insanity.
It is like interpreting the economic and political societies to determine how businesses are succeeding.