The role of religion also set the middle colonies apart. then again, which colonies are you referring to? I've seen the middle colonies list vary from one source to another. Virginia was normally assumed to be with the southern colonies. This would leave Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and sometimes, New York. Maryland was meant as a Catholic refuge in honor of Lord Baltimore, and you would have to understand the protestant vs catholic conflicts to really understand that significance. Pennsylvania, or Penn's woods, was started by William Penn, a Quaker, and the quakers were reviled in England. They refused to take up arms which made them just short of traitors in the eyes of the English Crown. As a result, Pennsylvania had the greatest religious freedom written into its founding documents by Penn.
A-B problems is the issue of how well one can predict behavior on the basis of attitudes.
Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Extreme abolitionists did more harm than good because they
tended towards extreme militancy, and with their use of virulent words, the extreme
abolitionists turned off Southerners to their cause. This did more harm than
good, first to the slaves, then also the abolition cause in general.
Answer:
When we read rhetorically, we are moving beyond simply trying to comprehend what an author is saying at a basic level. Instead, one who reads rhetorically seeks to understand how meaning in a text is shaped not only by the text itself, but also the context.
