1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
7

In August of 1996, Centennial Olympic Stadium opened in Atlanta. It had a maximum capacity of 85,000, people. However, later tha

t year the stadium was reconfigured, and the seating capacity reduced to 50,000.
Which of these is the BEST explanation for the change made to Centennial Olympic Stadium?
A) State law said that no stadiums could hold more than 50,000, people.
B) After the Olympics, the stadium became home to the Atlanta Braves baseball team.
C) After the Olympics, the stadium became home to the Atlanta Falcons football team.
D) The University of Georgia sued because the stadium was larger than their stadium
Social Studies
2 answers:
Andreyy893 years ago
7 0
Its D I Guess, Well I Hope It Is

RideAnS [48]3 years ago
6 0
The stadium was converted to the home stadium of the Atlanta Braves, and there was no need for a large track stadium since one had been built just four years earlier in downtown Atlanta. Your answer is B.
You might be interested in
____ was tied directly to politicsl status ? A ) religion B ) landownership C ) citizenship D ) employement E ) church membershi
NeTakaya
Your answer is going to be E I knew this answer
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What leads to an increase in the specialization of laborers
Anni [7]
Specialization of labors leads towards productivity 
7 0
3 years ago
The kurds are a people group with no homeland. they often are the victims of intimidation and violence which has resulted in the
pogonyaev
<span>His conclusions from the Conflict theoretical perspective. The theory of conflict is a sociological and psychological theory in which the material, social and political interpretation of history is emphasized. Mainly about conflicts of power or class of a specific period of history, or of a specific country or culture. <span>One of his greatest theorists is Karl Marx, who analyzed history through various economic phases and knows his theory as Marxism.

I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Chan came home drunk from a party on Saturday night. Luckily he was given a ride home. He threw his apartment keys down somewher
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

state-dependent

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Before 509 B.C., a king ruled Rome. Then, the city established the Roman Republic with power divided among 3 branches of governm
Komok [63]

Answer:

There were not "branches" of government in the modern sense with the judiciary separated from the legislature and the executive.  But Ammianus is not correct that the Senate had "all" the power either.  The Senate appointed the Consuls each year (the executives, who effectively took the place of kings) and pretty much all the other officials.  Senate resolutions (consults) had virtually the force of law.  The Senate itself could act as a judiciary over its own members, particularly in cases of treason and such, and the officials they appointed had judicial as well as executive powers in their respective jurisdictions.  

But there were also other, broader assemblies, of the army, the citizens, and the plebs (the membership of which would have overlapped a lot), and each of those had genuine powers.  Formal written laws (leges) had to be voted in by the citizen assembly - they couldn't be simply decreed by the senate, and they had more weight than senate consults.  Perhaps most importantly, the tribunes of the plebs had veto power over the acts of any official, which was a protection of the rights of common citizens against abuse by patricians.  

The whole thing had begun with revolt against the abuses of corrupt kings.  The senate had probably been a council of nobles advising the kings before that.  With the kings gone, the senate took control, and the appointment of consuls was a way to have someone fill the roles kings had played like leading the army.  Over the first couple of centuries of the republic, there was great civil strife between patricians (nobles in the senate) and plebeians (commoners), particularly over burdens of military service and taxation.  The outcome of it was the growth of the plebeian assembly's powers and the tribunes, and the creation of a system that would admit leading plebeians as well as patricians to the senate's ranks through public service.  So it all evolved in response to the demands of the time.<u>(Answer not mine)</u>

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Krystal's obstetrician has told her that the baby she is about to deliver has his buttocks down in the uterus. krystal's baby is
    9·1 answer
  • _____,____ are the rights that every person possesses, such as the right to be treated equally by the government
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these industries is NOT a major cause of deforestation in Latin America?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the five characteristics of a mineral
    15·2 answers
  • What did the Romans develop to improve sanitation?​
    8·2 answers
  • What types is rich in biodiversity ?​
    8·2 answers
  • In the AD-AS model, which of the following is true?
    9·1 answer
  • What is democracy?help me​
    14·1 answer
  • What components in a map are representations of something else?
    6·2 answers
  • Who has referred to as "Moses" during Slavery?<br> points!!
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!