Answer:Parliamentary Government.
Explanation:
A Parliamentary government is more accountable to the people because the executive branch derives its legitimacy from legislature or 'parliament' in this case. Furthermore, the legislature is elected by the people. So, the decisions made by government are influenced by the will of the people.
Among many, there are three historical issues that have been used to debate the different interpretations of the Constitution.
The first historical issue was the right to vote. The 15th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution established the right to vote. No person’s vote could be taken away due to his race, color. This was an important step for the equality in the U.S.
The second historical issue was the woman rights to vote. The 19th Amendment allowed the women in the country the right to vote. This was another historical moment for human rights in America.
Another historical issue that has been used to debate the Constitution was the right to vote to youngsters. The 26th Amendment allowed young men and women the right to vote. Originally, the age to vote was 21 years-old.
Deb's role in the group is the "devil's advocate".
The devil's advocacy decision making basic leadership strategy is the place the gathering is permitted to wind up the fault finder in the proposed choice. This method anticipates mindless obedience and expands the shot of a brilliant choice.
The greatest quality to utilizing the devil's advocate technique is the capacity to avert oblivious obedience, which is the place individuals endeavor to wipe out conflict and concede to a choice despite the fact that it won't not be the best option.
Answer:
The end of the First World War in 1918 was a time of great social and economic transition that led directly to what made the 1920's “The Roaring Twenties.” ... Technological advancements, urbanization, and immigration led directly to the social upheavals of the 1920s.
Answer:
Has generalized from one situation to another inappropriately.
Explanation:
In this case, Oliver has generalized the context of a party with that of the classroom where, in contrast, different rules are held. He believed that the same thing would happen in two different places, with two different stimulus.
Generalization occurs when we think that the response to a stimuli will be the same way that the response to a conditioned stimuli.
