Answer:
Proof in explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm going to attempt this by squeeze theorem.
We know that
is a variable number between -1 and 1 (inclusive).
This means that
.
for all value
. So if we multiply all sides of our inequality by this, it will not effect the direction of the inequalities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2114b/2114b6211340f9076ccb94152db8299744795686" alt="-x^4 \le x^4 \cos(\frac{2}{x}) \le x^4"
By squeeze theorem, if data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2114b/2114b6211340f9076ccb94152db8299744795686" alt="-x^4 \le x^4 \cos(\frac{2}{x}) \le x^4"
and
, then we can also conclude that
.
So we can actually evaluate the "if" limits pretty easily since both are continuous and exist at
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fae/27fae52358a27a902a60797738fbb54dd8324df2" alt="\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}x^4=0^4=0"
.
We can finally conclude that
by squeeze theorem.
Some people call this sandwich theorem.
Answer:
the number of hamburgers sold on Thursday were 325.
Step-by-step explanation:
The total number of hamburger and cheese burger is missing
i will replace it with any figure, you can replace it wit your given data and you will get the solution.
A local hamburger shop sold a combined total of 593 hamburgers and cheeseburgers on Thursday
There were 57 fewer cheeseburgers sold than hamburgers
How many hamburgers were sold on thursday
Let h be the number of hamburgers and c be the number of cheeseburgers.
Using this information we can set up two equation as:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbcc5/dbcc5af020c426fe2d43a8304181622b960334fe" alt="h+c=593\\c=h-57"
Now we need to solve these two equations to get the value of number of hamburgers. For that we use substitution method as shown below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e8cf/3e8cf231ef78b1fbab35a350eef4cfbf265077f6" alt="h+h-57=593\\2h-57=593\\2h=650\\h=325"
Therefore, the number of hamburgers sold on Thursday were 325.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
y = (-1/2)x + 4 is the equation of a straight line with y-intercept (0, 4) and slope -1/2.
To graph this, first plot the y-intercept (0, 4).
Recall that slope m = rise / run, and notice that the slope in this particular case is -1/2 = rise / run, or rise = -1 and run = 2.
Starting with your pencil point on (0, 4), move the point 2 units to the right (run = 2), arriving at (2, 4). Next, move your pencil point 1 unit down, to (2, 3).
Draw a straight line through (0, 4) and (2, 3).
Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42429/4242953ddf11854d26bf9a749829a2d2774ab37f" alt="y = 5 {x}^{3} - 2"
Step-by-step explanation:
The given differential equation is :
xy′−3y=6
We want to determine which of the following options is a solution to the differential equations.
The function that satisfies the differential equation is a solution.
We can verify that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42429/4242953ddf11854d26bf9a749829a2d2774ab37f" alt="y = 5 {x}^{3} - 2"
satisfy this differential equation.
We differentiate to get:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ace7b/ace7b5cf61a3de4dfa623f617316d07c6d18f2fa" alt="y' = 15 {x}^{2}"
We substitute the function and its derivative into the differential equation to get:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa437/fa4377ffef4d5a3adc608d146571fdf30c9b466e" alt="x(15 {x}^{2}) - 3(5 {x}^{3} - 2) = 6"
We expand and simplify on the left:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb360/fb360b6c4bb3255ec48864a2a438ed2b6289c3dc" alt="15 {x}^{3}- 15 {x}^{3} + 6= 6"
This simplifies to:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc3d2/dc3d2ee76a36139b3251511e692d64bc94847a63" alt="6 = 6"
Verified.
We can show that all the other functions do not satisfy this differential equation