France and Spain, for instance, were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule was absolute; their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. The English colonists, on the other hand, enjoyed far more freedom.
Spanish and French colonist were only going to the Americas for for trade ,gold and silver. England went there to get religious freedom and land.
The Spanish and English colonies were slightly alike in the poor and unfair treatment of indigenous people and substantially different in religion and economic base. The Spanish and English were slightly comparable in terms of treatment of indigenous people. It was different .
To know more about Spanish and English colonies here
brainly.com/question/8695886
#SPJ4
Answer:
Mecca leaders were worried about losing their political and economic power. The expansion of Islam, the new religion preached by Muhammad, contradicted traditional beliefs and practices of the Arab tribes. Its condemnation of idolatry and its monotheistic character was particularly troubling for them. The Quraysh tribe heads in Mecca controlled the Kaaba - a key religious place still important in Islam -, and their political and religious power rested upon managing access to polytheistic shrines. So, Muhammad´s doctrine of one God - Allah - questioned their legitimacy and sociopolitical position.
Explanation:
Evidence beyond the Documents:
This additional piece of evidence must be different from the evidence used to earn the point for contextualization.
<span>forced showdown between the southern states to themselves.</span>
