Personality Disorder is the correct answer.
People with personality disorder exhibits a personality that is considered odd or eccentric. Research has shown that those who suffer from personality disorders do not experience emotions the same way as the majority of people do. Even though it's not common to be diagnosed with a personality disorder before the age of 18 (since, at this age, one's personality is still developing), studies suggest that personality disorders begins in adolescence or early adulthood causing distress or impairment.
Answer: skin cancer
Explanation: Carcinogens may be defined as substances which are capable of inducing the development of cancerous cells in living tissue. The students described in the scenario, were of the opinion that subjecting frogs in a smoke filled environment fro a prolonged period will result in the development of lung cancer in the frog. The hypothesis might have stemmed from the thought of the risk in which smokers are very liable of being victims of cancerous cells. However, exposing frogs to such will not result in them developing lung cancer. However, carcinogens such as asbestos, vinyl chloride, benzene, nickel and so one have large tendency of resulting in skin cancer when exposed to air.
The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
