1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesantik [10]
3 years ago
15

BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!

English
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago
6 0
In this excerpt Marcus faces the conflict that his father doesn't agree with him. This type of conflict is called "Man vs. Man" It is the most common type of conflict in a piece of literature, it is also known as interpersonal conflict. In a man vs. man conflict, the protagonist, Marcus, feels something different than another character or the antagonist. This is the type of conflict that Marcus faces.

Hope this helps! :)
You might be interested in
Please help me with this response ASAP this is due today. If correct I will give brainiest and I want an answer fast please.
butalik [34]

I can’t see the words clearly can you retake the pics

7 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
It’s a rainy day, but you want to convince your friend to go for a run with you
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

tell him playing with you is so fun if you will not play nor I will

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the authors main purpose in writing the story katie sower
malfutka [58]
To make sure she wasn’t the last girl who made it in the super bowl
5 0
2 years ago
Read this passage from "The Calypso Borealis" and answer the following question:
n200080 [17]

The feeling that Muir suggests in this paragraph is:

  • Happiness
<h3 /><h3>What feeling is suggested here?</h3>

The suggested feeling in this text is happiness. As can be seen in the details of the text, Muir was happy to explore all the places he could and even rejoiced at many of the places and things that he came across.

So, we can say that he felt happiness.

Learn more about the feeling of happiness here:

brainly.com/question/7292814

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When might an author appropriately change styles?
    13·1 answer
  • (6) The young Red Cloud is said to have been a fine horseman, able to swim across the Missouri and Yellowstone rivers, of high b
    7·1 answer
  • Advantages and disadvanges of social ​
    14·2 answers
  • Correct two error THERE'S MANY WAYS TOO SAVE MONEY
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these might be a typical setting in gothic writing
    12·1 answer
  • What is meant by “complex sentence”?
    11·1 answer
  • Am i the only one who when i'm in a good mood i listen to Halestorm??? If I am imma be very disappointed in my choice of happy m
    9·2 answers
  • Which theme of commitment is reflected in these lines? People who are dedicated to a cause must always act independently, instea
    5·1 answer
  • Pls help 100 points
    14·2 answers
  • Prompt:
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!