This depends on what day & time
For example, we will use the Cold War:
1. About Money: The US funded many projects & countries with money, equipment, supplies, & resources, to try to help rebuild/ build up their countries, while trying to stop communism from spreading it's control over those same countries. The USSR also tried to gain control of territories by taking them over militarily, or sending resources & setting up Communist governments that supported the USSR. This usually costed a lot of money, & sometimes put strain to their economy (especially for the USSR's)
2. About Mail: The US used censors during the Cold War, and tried to find communist sympathizers and communist spies that were located inside the US. They would read people's mails to find out if they were pro-communist, and take decisive action depending on what it was.
3. About the Military: Both sides supplied military & logistical needs to their allies, as seen in the Korean, Vietnam, Bay of Pigs Invasion, etc wars. Take for example the Korean war. The US & the NATO sent support to help stem off the Communist onslaught, & today they are still split. (this is technically a success, because this was their first objective anyways). Another example is the Vietnam War. With the knowledge of terrain, support from China & the USSR, the Viet Cong was able to defeat the US, as the US soldiers were unfamiliar with the area, and the support for the war was growing cold. As seen in the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the US & USSR did not intervene directly. The USSR trained & supplied Fidel Castro, while the US used the CIA to train the exiled people to try to topple Castro's government. This failed, & was a win for the USSR.
These are the examples during the Cold War for the 3 points
hope this helps
Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
Answer: Freedom of religion, a wealth of the New World.
Explanation:
Religious and economic reasons are elementary factors of Puritan migrations to the New World. In England, the Puritans came into conflict with the church but also with the state over religion. Namely, during the sixteenth century, the Protestant movement spread throughout Europe. Protestants demanded a return to original Christianity and criticized the luxury of the church. In England, the movement had a large number of supporters called Puritans. Unable to achieve their new world goals, they decided to leave for England and migrate to North America.
Since the discovery of North America, news of wealth in the New World has arrived in Europe. America then had many natural and mineral resources. Certainly, the effort to exploit North America's natural and mineral resources was one of the elements of the English colonization of the continent.
