I am pretty sure that the way how Muslim conquerors usually treated Christians and Jews in the lands they conquered is being revealed by the third option from the scale represented above :The Muslims let Christians and Jews practice their faiths. Even though these were second-class citizens the only thing they were allowed to do is to<span> practice their faiths.</span>
<span>
</span>the Sedition Act of 1918 for the first one<span>
for the second =The events of the first few months of 1917, from the resumption of unrestricted submarine attacks to the Zimmerman telegram, broke the back of the antiwar movement and substantially increased enthusiasm for American intervention. But some dissident voices remained. Among the firmest congressional opponents was the progressive Wisconsin senator Robert M. La Follette. On April 4, 1917, two days after President Woodrow Wilson’s call for war, La Follette argued in this speech before Congress that the United States had not been even-handed in its treatment of British and German violations of American neutrality. A Republican senator from a state with a large agricultural and German-American population, La Follette worried that the war would divert attention from domestic reform efforts. But even in Wisconsin La Follette met opposition; the state legislature censured him, as did some of his longtime progressive allies. One of them said that he was “of more help to the Kaiser than a quarter of a million troops.”
</span>
Armed conflict resulted from militarism. Military weapons were outlawed as a result of militarism, is the way militarism play in increasing tensions in Europe.
<h3>What led to
tension in Europe and militarism?</h3>
In Europe, nationalism was also a new and powerful cause of the conflict. It was associated to militarism and ran against to the imperial powers' objectives in Europe. National identity allows for new fields of interest in which governments could compete.
Thus, armed conflict resulted from militarism.
For more details about tension in Europe and militarism, click here:
brainly.com/question/12457195
#SPJ1
Answer:
Legalism believed that STRICT LAWS AND PUNISHMENTS would make states stronger.
