Answer:
It leads to a focus on certain aspects of a problem
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the main tendency that this statement seems to have is that favoring one perspective leads to a focus on certain aspects of a problem. This prevents the sociologists to see the whole picture and would cause a misguided conclusion because of it.
Based on the scenario above, the conditioned response is Duke's bark. The conditioned response is defined as the automatic response that is associated with the previously neutral stimulus that yield a response. Duke's bark is the conditioned response in the scenario above.
The Equal Protection Clause is the correct answer.
The equal protection clause, found within the 14th amendment, has the purpose of protecting individuals' rights against discrimination. Under this provision, the same rights, privileges, and protection is guaranteed to all citizens. Therefore, this constitutional clause might be useful to support her case.
Augustus did not encourage unmarried women to have more children if I'm not mistaken. I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
It's egoist because it's imposed by an Almighty Power (God in this case), and even if you have the free will, one way or another, it's a condition to be good.
It's consequentialist because every choice you make, based on God's commandments, you will have a consequence, for the good or for the bad.
And finally, it's deontological because you are morally conditioned to choose, you don't have the option to put aside, it's a social convention to choose.
Explanation:
The Divine Command Theory address that everything that happens is based on the power and choice of an Almighty Power and humans are conditioned to choose. Even with the free will, the social and moral conditions demands a choice, that's why it's an egoist, consequentialist and deontological theory.
