Answer:
There are some reasons behind the political instability in Nepal.First is the volatile internal political structure. The Nepalese leaders have not been able to institutionalize the political changes and have been experimenting with different systems. The Palace was also involved in this thing.Next is the geo -political interests of India, china and the western powers. Their struggle to maintain their influence in Nepal did not allowed Nepali politics to be stable. They got involved in change of leadership and systems in Nepal so that their interests could be established. India seems to be wanting complete control over Nepali leadership and then in over the economy, hydro power, and other developmental activities. It wants Nepal to be dependent over itself and so far is successful in it. China is more concerned about Free Tibet movement. There are many Tibetan refugees in Nepal. The Western powers, with the help from India, want to utilize the Tibetan refugees for Free Tibet movement.Next is the lack of strong alternative political leadership. Nepalese people have to vote for the same inefficient political leadership every time. Also, the Nepalese voters are not willing sufficiently to change the leadership
Explanation:
<span>counterbalancing influences by which an organization or system is regulated, typically those ensuring that political power is not concentrated in the hands of individuals or groups. So this means that we would have maybe a monarchy and definitely monopoly's </span><span />
Llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Answer:
Weber's law
Explanation:
Weber's law states that the change in a stimulus that will be just noticeable is a constant ratio of the original stimulus. It has been shown not to hold for extremes of stimulation. The ability to perceive a change in a quantity decreases in proportion to its magnitude.
It was important because it brought water to the crops
