Answer:
World history, global history or transnational history is a field of historical study that emerged as a distinct academic field in the 1980s. It examines history from a global perspective. World History looks for common patterns that emerge across all cultures.Based on these definitions, the process of globalization largely differentiates global and world history. World history encompasses a history that is not necessarily completely interconnected through globalization, while global history examines this specific history of interconnectivity.
Explanation:
Valid upto 5 marks for seniors(6-9)
The plan was set forth. The giants — Calhoun, Webster, and Clay — had spoken. Still the Congress debated the contentious issues well into the summer. Each time Clay's Compromise was set forth for a vote, it did not receive a majority. Henry Clay himself had to leave in sickness, before the dispute could be resolved. In his place, Stephen Douglas worked tirelessly to end the fight. On July 9, President Zachary Taylor died of food poisoning. His successor, MILLARD FILLMORE, was much more interested in compromise. The environment for a deal was set. By September, Clay's Compromise became law.
California was admitted to the Union as the 16th free state. In exchange, the south was guaranteed that no federal restrictions on slavery would be placed on Utah or New Mexico. Texas lost its boundary claims in New Mexico, but the Congress compensated Texas with $10 million. Slavery was maintained in the nation's capital, but the slave trade was prohibited. Finally, and most controversially, a FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW was passed, requiring northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners under penalty of law
Answer:
The only powers granted by the Articles of Confederation were things like declaring war, foreign affairs, or making treaties- powers necessary for the government during the Revolution. The states were only unified by a "firm league of friendship," and each state had one vote in Congress no matter the size, to ensure that the larger states did not infringe on the rights or wishes of the smaller states.
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!
Ancient Egypt had pharaohs as their leaders. Similar to kings, pharaohs were picked by whoever was next in the bloodline. Pharaohs were on top of the social structure, followed by nobles and priests, soldiers, scribes, merchants, artisans, farmers and finally slaves. The pharaoh ranked above everyone else and his word was absolute. The pahraoh was the person who looked over everything. Whatever he said, people had to do.
The golden pillars were used a long time ago
