Answer:
Annual return for the year 2005 is closest to - 44.32%
Explanation:
Additional information is available on the picture attached
Data given below are from the picture attached
Current value = $ 7.72, Original value = $ 14.87
Dividends earned per quarter = $ 0.14 ⇒Total Dividend earned = $ (0.14 * 4)
Total Dividend earned = $ 0.56
Annual Return = * 100%
Annual Return = = * 100%
Annual Return = - 44.3174% ≈ <u>- 44.32%</u>
<u></u>
Therefore, annual return for the year 2005 is closest to - 44.32%
Answer:
It would be better to enter a new business area by acquisition when a company is considering implementing horizontal integration or when they are pursuing vertical integration and the company is lacking the distinctive competencies to establish a quick presence and reputation. Acquisition allows a company to purchase quicker than it takes to establish its own company that is similar. Also, acquisitions are less risky because there is less commercial uncertainty and the company is able re-search the turn get are interested and get have unpublished reputation, lastly, they are attractive because there are high barriers to entry
Explanation:
The statement above is TRUE. This is because, when the price of a commodity is set below the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded will exceed the quantity supplied. The rent control is meant to favour the consumers and because the price is now lower, the consumers will demand more while the supplier will supply less because their profits have been negatively affected.
While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.
Explanation:
- Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.
- Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
- Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.
The costs of welfare can vary in which country your in but it can amount to a big percentage in spending here.
Consequences can be positive, as poverty could otherwise lead to riots and violence, and the benefits of integrating the people in need into the society are big. On the other hand, too generous and easy to obtain support can lead to the fact that people would choose to stay on welfare rather than work.
Hope it helps :D