Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options, we can answer the following.
Many middle colonies were created so that people could gain wealth but in contrast, many New England colonies served as a refuge for people who faced religious persecution.
That was the case of the Puritans, that had so many differences in Britain with the Church of England and were persecuted for religious motives. The Puritans decided to emigrate to North America and arrived at Cape Town, Massachusets in 1620. There, they founded the Plymouth colony, a place where they could live and teach their strict religious principles.
The correct answer here is the option D.
Tet offensive was a major offensive undertook by the Viet Cong along with the North Vietnamese People's Army of Vietnam and it showed the shocked South Vietnam and its American allies that the war was actually far from over. This also led to the loss of the support for the war in the States.
The Battle of Saratoga was a turning point in the Revolutionary War, after this battle, many countries including France thought the Patriots could win the war.
The answer is the second option. (Option B)
