Juan is likely to forget words that appeared in the middle of the list if she has a Long List of Words.
<h3>What is a List of Word?</h3>
As the name implies, a list of words can be a sequential or nonsequential arrangement of words in form of a list or an array from the top to the bottom.
Let's assume that there is a 20 list of words, in most cases the eye is usually focused on the upper part(early) and the lower part(last) of the list while ignoring the words in the middle.
Therefore, we can conclude that Juan is likely to forget words that appeared in the middle of the list if she has a Long List of Words.
Learn more about words here:
brainly.com/question/25693822
Socialism - means of production owned by the people and the government for the welfare of society
Socialism is actually a middle term between the free market and the communism. The State has a lot of power and is supposed to use it to redistribute the wealth among the people.
Capitalism - small percentage of private individuals have ownership over means of production
It generally is like that in our world, but it doesn't necessarily need to be true. Capitalism is a system that is all about free trade and anyone can produce and sell their services or products. Generally, there is always someone who gets big enough to employ thousands of people, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. Even though many of the means of production might end up owned by few people, generally speaking, capitalism made the world richer and more technologically evolved.
Utopianism - Ideal society in which everyone is treated fairly and taken care of
The word Utopia was first used by Sir Thomas More in his book Utopia (1516). By definition, a utopia would be "an imagined place or state of things in which everything is perfect.
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
<span>When writing an essay like this, it is important to make connections between the historical issues at hand and the current events that are shaped by these issues. </span>