If your options are: a) The competing interests of the people were institutionalized in the Estates General, generating a "reciprocal struggle" that would reconcile discordant powers, b) The monarchy, though occasionally unjust, provided stability and security, <span>c) The "discordant interests" of the various corporate bodies of France— the guilds, municipalities, nobility, and </span>
clergy— were mediated by the monarch and his officials, and <span>d) All of the above, the correct answer in my opinion is d) All of the above. Burke provides a comprehensive critique of the French revolution in all of its aspects. Even though he admits it was a remarkable event, he disagrees that it would bring about a new, more just and sound political system. Of course, the old monarchy was bad in many respects, but it didn't have to be abolished altogether. It could be fixed. Instead, monarchy was replaced by anarchy and traditions were violently dismantled.</span>
I can’t see that choices but I can say this indicates that only about half of sub-Saharan Africa’s 128 million school-aged children currently attending school are likely to acquire the basic skills needed for them to live healthy and productive lives.
Answer:
The qualities that let to America's success are liberty, egalitarianism, individualism, populism among others.
Explanation:
The main quality that let to America's success is it's commitment to liberty in a sense that each and every individual is responsible for his/her actions. This is in line with the principles of equal opportunity and self-determination.
Egalitarianism or equalitarianism is a belief that all people are equal, and the US is a nation of free people that live in a free land that creates opportunity for everyone.
Individualism refers to the qualities of self-reliance and the supreme worth of the individual as well as the quality of self-dependence.
Finaly we have populism which is a philosophy which emphesizes the fight for the rights of the people and the majority against the rights and privilages of the few.
Answer:
schools were too exspensive for the majority of the population. there were not alot of schools that were free.
Explanation:
