Answer:
Kennedy's purpose is to evoke public ethics and emotion.
Explanation:
In his inaugural speech Kennedy cites recalls the experiences of war to evoke an ethical appeal to his audience, showing that he is a reliable person who works within ethics and standards, in addition to being experienced and who knows the difficult times and ways to act within them. He also reports religious literature to provoke emotion to the public, to show humanity to the person he is and reaffirms his empathy and commitment to Christian and traditional values.
Literature and the Holocaust have a complicated relationship. This isn't to say, of course, that the pairing isn't a fruitful one—the Holocaust has influenced, if not defined, nearly every Jewish writer since, from Saul Bellow to Jonathan Safran Foer, and many non-Jews besides, like W.G. Sebald and Jorge Semprun. Still, literature qua art—innately concerned with representation and appropriation—seemingly stands opposed to the immutability of the Holocaust and our oversized obligations to its memory. Good literature makes artistic demands, flexes and contorts narratives, resists limpid morality, compromises reality's details. Regarding the Holocaust, this seems unconscionable, even blasphemous. The horrors of Auschwitz and Buchenwald need no artistic amplification.
can you provide the text?
