I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Why did President Lincoln's argument that secession was not constitutional?
Answer is c
Well Frederick Douglas always told people to have faith in a higher being so your answer is D
Their planting seasons probably had to do a lot with when they thought their gods changed the seasons.
Answer:
A. Some rulers raised armies to conquer larger territories and defend their borders.
B. Rulers made laws for their subjects and set up courts to keep the laws.
D. Conquering rulers seized land from nobles and gave it to those who would swear allegiance to them as king.
