The british restriction of trade can be considered a violation of natural rights because : restriction inferred with individuals pursuit of economic self -interest
Restriction often forced individuals to bend to a country's will in the context of economic activities.
hope this helps
Answer: If one can not understand history, they are doomed to repeat it.
Explanation:
Many socialist regimes fell due to moronic leadership and horrible government(plagued by socialism). With that in mind, it wouldn’t be so good if a president’s inaugural address was similar to socialists’ speeches or included socialist ideas.
Answer:
The answer is "No"
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.
Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.
Answer: C. They have acted as an obstacle between the eastern and western sections of the state.
Explanation: I did the k12 test so that's how I know! :) ;)
Explanation:
1 - Puppetry, being used by his former jailers and racists to push white interests and selling out his own people.
2 - Lack of vision. He was not a reformer. He failed to reform South Africa, the country’s cultural values, education system and so on.
3 - He failed to address the crime situation and endemic violence in the society.
4 - He failed to improve and expand the education system to everybody.
5 - He was not practical. He thought every crisis could be solved by talking peace, while the enemy is busy invading, raping and butchering civilians. Case in point, the DRC war. He opposed intervention in the war as 25,000 Ugandan and 6000 Rwandan soldiers advanced towards the capital. This is the kind of leader who would allow terrorists and invaders to cause mayhem, instead of countering the insurgency with military force.
6 - He was not much of a Pan Africanist. He took his orders from his western handlers. He was told what to say and do.
7 - He threw the struggle of black people under the bus, in favour of international celebrity status. Being feted by celebraties was more important to him than reforming his country.
8 - Results of Mandela's legacy can be seen today. A highly uneducated, destructive and violent population. Mass school dropouts. Highest crime rates in the world. Millions of people living in slums.
