1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
9

Which scenario describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent?

History
2 answers:
Alika [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer,

The Supreme court rules that companies must pay men and women equal wages despite earlier court ruling allowing wage differences.

Explanation,

Principle of precedent means the judge in charge is supposed to do the ruling based on a previous ruling by a court of higher authority.Principle of precedent is followed if the cases have similar facts and predictable outcome.the judge on appeal is bound to adhere to prior decisions made by a higher court on a similar legal matter unless  he believes there is an important reason to make a different ruling.

Natalka [10]3 years ago
5 0
A the supreme court rules that companies must pay men and women equal wages despite earlier court rulings allowing wage differences.
You might be interested in
What is credited with ending the Great Depression?
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

B. The New Deal

Explanation:

"The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that aimed to restore prosperity to Americans. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he acted swiftly to stabilize the economy and provide jobs and relief to those who were suffering."

"Since the late 1930s, conventional wisdom has held that President Franklin D. Roosevelt ’s “ New Deal ” helped bring about the end of the Great Depression. The series of social and government spending programs did get millions of Americans back to work on hundreds of public projects across the country."

3 0
2 years ago
World war 2
kramer

Based on the information in the excerpt, the United States brought Nazi leaders to military tribunals in Germany AFTER the end of World War II. <em>(a)</em>

BUT ... To our country's lasting shame, the horrors being inflicted on racially-selected segments of Germany's civilian population were well known to the US DURING the war, but our government did little or nothing to impede this barbaric activity and preserve civilian lives.  

For example, the railroad tracks that guided the cattle-cars full of Jews to their torture, starvation, and death at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Bergen-Belsen could have been disabled with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk.  But they were not.

The ovens in the concentration camps, or the camps themselves, could have been rendered operationally useless with a few well-placed bombs, easily, cheaply, and with minimal military risk.  But they were not.

6 0
3 years ago
Both John locke and Thomas Jefferson wrote about the natural rights of man. In what document are these unalienable rights specif
NeTakaya

Answer: The Declaration of Independence

5 0
3 years ago
Why did Britain and France agree to an armistice?
Vlad [161]

Answer: Both sides had suffered too much to continue, but Germany would be left battered by harsh terms.

6 0
3 years ago
What were two major accomplishments that were positive changes in the Progressive Era and what were two negative changes.
kotykmax [81]
1. The homestead act, First transcontinental railroad, pendelton act
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What amendment did progressives support because they wanted the rich to pay more taxes?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP
    5·1 answer
  • Why was napalm such a deadly weapon?
    7·2 answers
  • What seems to be saddam hussein's attitude about fighting in another war with the us
    14·2 answers
  • Between 461-420 bce known as the golden age of athens? who was the important leader of athens during the golden age
    14·1 answer
  • Which european nation aspired to form an alliance with the powerful iroquois confederacy in 1754 to protect its territory from o
    11·1 answer
  • According to the Judiciary Act of
    6·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
    10·1 answer
  • Brainliest whoever is correct first!
    9·2 answers
  • Any asian here ??????​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!