1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scilla [17]
3 years ago
10

Which two acts did not include a new tax? A) the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act. B) the Sugar Act and the Quartering Act. C) the Qu

artering Act and the Coercive Acts. D) the Coercive Acts and the Townshend Acts
History
2 answers:
ioda3 years ago
6 0
The two acts that did not include a new tax was the Quartering Act and the Coercive Acts. These acts were passed on March 28, 1774. The correct answer is C. 
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
5 0

C) The Quartering Act and the Coercive Acts.

All three mentioned laws: The Sugar, Stamp and Townshend Acts were legislatures enacted by the British government and directed to the American colonies, that included a new tax rate:

  • The Stamp Act (1765) required American colonists to pay a tax on every printed paper they used (legal documents, licenses, newspapers, other publications, playing cards, etc).
  • The Sugar Act (1764), imposed the rate of tax on molasses to three pence per gallon and took measures to strictly enforce the law. It also put a tax on other foreign goods such as sugar, certain wines, coffee, pimiento, cambric, and printed calico, and further, regulated the export of lumber and iron.
  • The Townshend Acts (1767) were a series of measures that taxed goods imported to the American colonies.

Unlike those acts<u>, the Quartering Act and the Coercive Acts didn't include any tax rate. The Quartering Act (1765)</u> was a statute requiring American colonial authorities to provide food, drink, quarters, fuel, and transportation to British forces stationed in their towns or villages. As for <u>The Coercive Acts, also named Intolerable Acts (1774)</u>, were four punitive laws to restore order in Massachusetts and punish Bostonians for their "Tea Party", which was a political protest from American colonist that occurred on December, 1773.

You might be interested in
Who wrote "Life must be lived as play."?
Novosadov [1.4K]
I think it was Plato
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe how America tried to deal with the 2nd Red Scare and describe the rise and fall of Joseph McCarthy.
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

American society faced many hardships when political opponents were turned anti-nationalist using the communist tag during the Cold war era.

Explanation:

The second Red Scare refers to the period in the history of the United States when fear of communism had penetrated the society during the early periods of the Cold War. House Un-American Activities Committee, the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, and McCarthy's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations were key congressional investigative committees. Those committee leaders and their employees collaborated with the FBI to recognize and prosecute suspected communists.

McCarthy was a young Wisconsin senator who stunned the nation in 1950 when he alleged to have information that large numbers of communists managed to hold prominent positions in the State Department.   He and other Republicans would use these arguments for the next two years to pressure out the Truman administration, and the anti-communist agenda played a key factor for their landslide win in the 1952 election. However, no evident proof soon made him a liability for his party, and his influence started to fade away.

8 0
3 years ago
The europeans met in germany to divide africa. what is that called
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

Berlin Conference

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Of what did the Franciscans take a vow?
creativ13 [48]
D. Poverty

Hope this helps :)
9 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it?
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.

Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.

C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.

It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.

I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How is chinese folk religion different from the five major religions?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Russia go to war against Sweden and the Ottoman Empire in the eighteenth century?
    13·2 answers
  • In what ways was colonial life attractive, and in what ways would it seem tediou
    15·1 answer
  • How can citizens ensure that the government truly represents the people?
    14·1 answer
  • What is another name for "Mesopotamia"?
    8·1 answer
  • The modern presidency is characterized by:
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the city of nanjing extremely vulnerable to japanese attack??
    12·2 answers
  • How did the cotton gin support the institution of slavery
    9·2 answers
  • How did Europeans resolve their conflicts over claims in Africa
    5·1 answer
  • How can I use government in my own definition
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!