Answer:
Log in
Sign up
American Foreign Policy
STUDY
PLAY
1) What was Washington's view of what US foreign policy ought to be? Why did he argue that nations should avoid antipathies and passionate attachments toward other nations? What should guide US foreign policy? Why?
He believed that the United States should have good relations with all countries but they should have not attachment to said countries. He believed that attachment to other countries would draw them into a war that they had no common interest being involved in. Antipathies also led to more frequent collisions and conflicts which is what the US did not want. Becoming friends with a stronger nation meant the weaker nation would become a satellite for the stronger one. In this case the US would be the weaker country and therefore the satellite. Promote trade and a commercial relationship but keep political connection at a minimum.
The US was weak at this time militarily and economically they had just been freed from British colonial control and needed trade only at this time
He believed that the United States should have good relations with all countries but they should have not attachment to said countries. He believed that attachment to other countries would draw them into a war that they had no common interest being involved in. Antipathies also led to more frequent collisions and conflicts which is what the US did not want. Becoming friends with a stronger nation meant the weaker nation would become a satellite for the stronger one. In this case the US would be the weaker country and therefore the satellite. Promote trade and a commercial relationship but keep political connection at a minimum.
The US was weak at this time militarily and economically they had just been freed from British colonial control and needed trade only at
I think one is good but I'm not sure
It doesn't apply to executive orders
Answer:
Minor riots occurred in several cities, and when the drawing of names began in New York on July 11, 1863, mobs (mostly of foreign-born, especially Irish, workers) surged onto the streets, assaulting residents, defying police, attacking draft headquarters, and burning buildings.
Explanation:
there is you answer :3
The correct answer is D.
The creation of free trade zones is a trade policy that consist on opening the national markets to foreign agents and therefore on eliminating trade barriers with other countries. The possibility of free entry attracts foreign capital and leads to higher levels of investment. Those new projects started with foreign money will need workers to function, and therefore will end up increasing employment too.
Such approach is opposite to the establishment of protectionist measures, which consist on setting trade barriers (custom duties such as tarriffs, quotas, etc.), and that would lead to the results explained in options A, B and C. It tariffs are set the goverment would increase the income earned from charging customs duties and the tariffs would prevent the free entrance of foreign competition. If the entry of foreign products and services is blocked is very likely that the influence of foreign countries decreases in South Korea.
