1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ziro4ka [17]
3 years ago
14

Why was the English bill of rights signed

History
2 answers:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: It was signed for limitation and because they needed more rigths basically.

Explanation:

ale4655 [162]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

For limitation.

Explanation:

Parliament passed the English bill to limit the power of king and queen. It also helped with freedom of speech ad improved elections.

You might be interested in
Which was one of the few accomplishments of the articles of confederation?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

C. Northwest Territory

Explanation:

One of the main accomplishments of the Congress under the Articles of Confederation was passage of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 organizing the settlement of the Northwest Territories.

7 0
2 years ago
Which document proposed that congress could force a state to obey a national law?
snow_tiger [21]
The Virginia plan

 It established a bicameral house that would legislate on behalf of the states and enforce the federal authority. Prior to that the thirteen states were living like thirteen nation as there was no power granted to the federal government to enforce its action on states.
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true of medieval chivalry?
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

i think It was a code of conduct that developed to reform knights' behavior

Explanation:

lmk if i am wrong
Medieval Chivalry has to deal with knights so

5 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!!
satela [25.4K]
A) using an earlier case as a guide.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court decided that a "clear and present danger" to the country allowed the feder
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

b. Restrict first amendment rights.

Explanation:

The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.

The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The North’s rapid economic growth during the Civil War was stimulated by a. the elimination of taxes on defense industries b. a
    9·1 answer
  • What happened as a result of bank closures and the Panic of 1837?
    9·1 answer
  • FREE POINTS TO THOSE WHO WORK HARD!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • I AM GIVING BRAINLIEST! PLEASEEEEEE HELPPPP I NEEDDD HELPPPPP
    13·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASE!!!<br> I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!
    8·1 answer
  • SS or Secret Police Explain why the method of control described made is possible for Hitler and the Nazi Party to gain, consolid
    12·1 answer
  • Review the four freedoms that Roosevelt describes at the end of the provided excerpt. In a two-paragraph response, compare these
    7·1 answer
  • Why does Caesar get angry at Metellus
    6·1 answer
  • रोम वासियों ने विदेशी बरबर किसे कहा ?
    9·1 answer
  • What economic policy uses government spending to manage the business cycle?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!