to separate and go in various direction
<span>Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (2010). The 5-4 decision that ensued ruled against laws prohibiting unions and corporations from using their general treasury funds on political advertisements. The rationale behind this decision is that it was a fundamental violation of the First Amendment's right to free speech, which of course allows for the right for individuals to express their views, opinions, and support of various causes without fear of retribution from the government. The decision was highly controversial and has unquestionably increased both the scope and influence of superPACS and special interest groups.</span>
dose this have multi answer choices??
Usually it would be the less there is the more people want it which is not an answer here it looks like. I would have to say B because it would be the opposite of what I just said which would still be correct.
Answer:
d. It offers advantages to influence lawmakers
Explanation: protecting this correct answer post accomplished.
