1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rusak2 [61]
3 years ago
9

How did loyalist play in georgia in the revolutionary war

History
1 answer:
GarryVolchara [31]3 years ago
4 0
Hello there.

How did loyalist play in georgia in the revolutionary war

As opponents<span> </span>
You might be interested in
What’s the India’s capital
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

<h2>New Delhi</h2>

"New Delhi is the capital of India and one of Delhi city's 11 districts. Although colloquially Delhi and New Delhi are used interchangeably to refer to the National Capital Territory of Delhi, these are two distinct entities, with New Delhi forming a small part of Delhi."

Explanation:

Brainliest?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
use the drop-down menus to choose the subordinating conjunction that best connects the two clauses. Neel enjoys growing fruits a
Sloan [31]

<em>Because/ Since/ As</em> Neel enjoys growing fruits and vegetables, he volunteers at the community garden.

Shonda is not allowed to get her ears pierced <em>until</em> she turns thirteen.

<em>Unless</em> you return my sweater, I will not lend you any more clothes.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WHO WAS THE INVENTOR OF THE TELEGRAPH......?? PLZZ HELPPPP
vitfil [10]

Answer:

Samuel Morse was the inventor of the telegraph...

Explanation:

Its was first developed during the decade of 1830 to 1840...

HOPE THIS HELPS!!

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Medicare is most accurate?
lidiya [134]

Medicare provides medical assistance to senior citizens.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many major systems of philosophy exist in Buddhism. I need long answer
Leto [7]

<span>As we have seen, several periods of thought emerged in the process of Buddhist development. At least two major systems of thought, roughly speaking, closely related to what we call the primitive Buddhism and the developed Buddhism. The first is the Buddhist history of thoughts, as defined by Buddhologists such as academician  Theodor Stcherbatsky (1866-1942); this division relied on different periods in the whole process of development of Buddhist thoughts. Second is the history of thoughts of Buddhist Schools, which includes several Buddhist schools; thus, you need to have time to study doctrines of each single school (e.g., Zen, </span><span>Pure Land</span>, or Tendai). Buddhism in China, for example, includes at least ten different schools, and each school also has its own system of thoughts and exclusive methods of practice.

<span>We may generally divide the first major system, the Buddhist history of thoughts, into two major categories based on history: a) Buddhist thoughts in the primitive period and b) Buddhist thoughts in the periods of development. Buddhist thoughts in the primitive period were established on the foundational teachings of Dependent Origination and non-self, which were taught directly by the Buddha after his attainment of ultimate enlightenment. The central content of these teachings explain that all existences (dharmas) in the three worlds—senses-sphere realm, fine form realm, and formless realm[3]— are nothing but the products of inter-beings from multi-conditions. They appear in either cosmic mode (e.g., institution, existence, transformation, and destruction) or in the flux of mental transformation (e.g., birth, being, alteration, and death). In this way, all things—both the physical and the mental—are born and die endlessly, dependent on multiple conditions in the cycle of samsāra. All that is present through this Law of Dependent Origination is, therefore, impermanent, ever-changing, and without any immortal entity whatsoever that is independent and perpetual__. This is the truth of reality through which the Buddha affirmed that “whether the Buddha appears or not, the reality of dharmas is always as such.” Based upon this fundamental teaching, Buddhists built for themselves an appropriate view of personal life and spiritual practice: the liberated life of non-self—the end goal of the spiritual journey.</span>

<span>Although Buddhist thought in periods of development were gradually formed by various schools, two prominent systems of philosophy emerged: the Mādhyamika and the Yogācāra. Both these two philosophical systems related strictly to the primitive thought of Paticcamūpāda; however, each system has its own approach to interpretations and particular concepts. The Mādhyamika developed the doctrine of Emptiness (Śūnyatā), while the Yogācāra instituted the teaching of Mind-only (Vijñapati-mātratā), emphasizing the concept of Ālaya (store consciousness). The doctrine of Emptiness focuses on explaining that the nature of all dharmas is emptiness of essence and that all dharmas are non-self by nature and existences are but manifestations of conditional elements. Thus, when a practitioner penetrates deeply into the realm of Emptiness, he or she simultaneously experiences the reality of the non-self. However, you should remember that the concept of Emptiness used here does not refer to any contradictory categories in the dualistic sphere, such as ‘yes’ and ‘no’ or ‘to be’ and ‘not to be.’ Rather, it indicates the state of true reality that goes beyond the world of dualism. For this reason, in the canonical languages of Mahāyāna Buddhism, the term Emptiness is used as a synonym for Nirvāna. In the Yogācāra philosophy, the concept of Ālaya—the most fundamental issue of this system of thought—points out that all problems of both suffering and happiness are the very outcomes of mental distinctions (vikalpa) between subject (atman) and object (dharma), or between self and other. This mental distinction is the root of all afflictions, birth-death, and samsāra. Thus, in the path of spiritual training, a practitioner must cleanse all attachments to self as it embodies what we call the ‘I’, ‘mine’, and ‘my self’ in order to return to the realm of pure mind, which is non-distinct by nature.</span>

<span>Based on what has been discussed here, clearly the consistency in Buddhist thoughts—whether origin or development—is that all teachings focus on purification of craving, hatred, and attachment to self in order to reach the reality of true liberation: the state of non-self or Nirvāna.</span>

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the cotton gin make processing Cotten easier?
    13·1 answer
  • Whose perspective is expressed in the following statement from the soviet union. Each of us fought alone to keep an honest name
    13·2 answers
  • What nation founded Brazil?
    8·2 answers
  • When the US census is completed each state is notified how its population affects its number of congressional districts this pro
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains the economic relationship described in the sources?
    15·1 answer
  • In 5 sentences answer the following question: What caused the “Scramble for Africa” and what was the effect? (Think Berlin Confe
    12·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP NOWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br><br> What were two issues we had with our money system?
    5·1 answer
  • This is wholly improper, argumentative. It is not a statement as to what the issues are. Your honor has already held that this a
    13·2 answers
  • Self-government is the power to act, think, and speak freely.
    5·1 answer
  • Look at the locations of four modern cites on lndain subcontinent what do these have in commmon
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!