1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
2 years ago
13

Follow these steps to complete the graded assignment for this unit. Use Internet or library resources to research the Treaty of

Versailles.To guide your research, consider the following questions: What were the major terms of the treaty? Why did the Allied leaders set these terms? How did Germans respond to the treaty in the decades that followed?Write an essay explaining the major points of the Treaty of Versailles and how it impacted Germany in the 1920s and 1930s. Use standard grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and punctuation. You will submit your work to your teacher in Part 2 of the assignment.
History
1 answer:
horsena [70]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The terms of the treaty required that Germany pay financial reparations, disarm, lose territory, and give up all of its overseas colonies. It also called for the creation of the League of Nations, an institution that President Woodrow Wilson strongly supported and had originally outlined in his Fourteen Points address

The main leaders at Versailles were Clemenceau (France), Lloyd George (Britain) and Wilson (USA). They set these terms because they were the victors, they blamed Germany for the conflict, they could take desired territory, and they wanted to make sure that Germany could never launch another attack

How did the Germans respond to the Treaty?

How did Germany react to the Treaty? Reactions to the Treaty in Germany were very negative. There were protests in the German Reichstag (Parliament) and out on the streets. ... There were also the humiliating terms, which made Germany accept blame for the war, limit their armed forces and pay reparations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Ano ang mga kahalagan ng halaman?​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

Ito ay nagdadala ng preskong hangin sa ating kapaligiran at ang kahalagahan nito ay ang mabigyang ganda o pagandahin ang ating kapaligiran

Explanation:

Kung mali man isipin nyo nalang kung anong magandang naidudulot ng halamansa atin

Hope it help

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did so many Americans oppose getting involved in WWII?
bekas [8.4K]
They were busy dealing with the great depression
6 0
4 years ago
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
3 years ago
The Anti-Federalists’ main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it
lukranit [14]
The Anti-Federalists’ main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it would give the federal government too much power--perhaps so much that it would become tyrannical.
5 0
3 years ago
HELP PLS ⟟ HAV ETO TURN IT KN TOMORROW PLS HELP ME
Nataly [62]

Answer:

8, 10, 11, 9  Hope this helped.

Explanation:

https://www.loc.gov/collections/continental-congress-and-constitutional-convention-from-1774-to-1789/articles-and-essays/timeline/1766-to-1767/

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the world plunged into World War II in 1939?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Germans believe that the Schlieffen Plan would allow them to 2 points
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following products is both a major import and export of the U.S
    8·1 answer
  • Which combination of Federal Reserve and Congressional actions would be best to fight inflation?
    10·2 answers
  • ASAP! SOS!<br> witch country defeated the Arabs in the battle of tours
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following are features common to all games?
    10·1 answer
  • 1 Point
    12·1 answer
  • How were the colonists’ views on government influenced during the American Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • Senator_____ proposed politics to improve the national economy known as the American System​
    15·1 answer
  • I will give the first correct answer as brainliest.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!