Answer:
824.28
Explanation:
Market price of a bond is the total sum of discounted coupon cashflow and par value at maturity. This is a 4-year bond with semi-annual payment so there will be 8 coupon payment in total. Let formulate the bond price as below:
Bond price = [(Coupon rate/2) x Par]/(1 + Required return/2) + [(Coupon rate/2) x Par]/(1 + Required return/2)^2 + ... + [(Coupon rate/2) x Par + Par]/(1 + Required return/2)^8
Putting all the number together, we have
Bond price = [(4.5%) x 1000]/(1 + 7.5%) + [(4.5%) x 1000]/(1 + 7.5%)^2 + ... + [(4.5%) x 1000 + 1000]/(1 + 7.5%)^8
= 824.28
Answer: C. Ahrens will respond aggressively because of the high multimarket contact between Hilliard and Ahrens.
Explanation:
Ahrens will respond aggressively because of the high multimarket contact between Hilliard and Ahrens.
Ahrens Vitamins and Hilliard Pharmaceuticals have high Market commonality. They operate in the same geographical area and their target market is the same, meaning an increase in Profits for Hilliard Pharmaceuticals is a decrease in profits for Ahrens Vitamins, an attack from Hilliard will ave severe consequences for Ahrens Pharmaceuticals as they compete for the same target market.
Ahrens Vitamins will have to respond aggressively to attacks from Hilliard Pharmaceuticals in order to maintain their position in the market
Answer:
a. $118,000
Explanation:
When preparing a cash flow statement, using indirect method we add decrease in current assets and we deduct increase in current assets.
Here it is provided that income reported = $110,000
Opening balance of accounts receivables = $40,000
Closing balance of accounts Receivables = $32,000
Change in Accounts receivables = Closing - Opening = $32,000 - $40,000 = - $8,000
Therefore there is decrease in accounts receivables which is a current asset.
Thus Cash Flow from operating activities
Net Income = $110,000
Add: Decrease in current assets = $8,000
Net cash flow from operating activity = $118,000
Correct option is
a. $118,000
Answer:
The installers and experts are self employed because;
-
Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc has no influence over the work other than finishing the venture by a specific time and the installers and experts can pick the days wherein they need to work.
-
The installers and specialists are occupied with various business as the business is into deals and The installers and experts are into administration.
-
The work isn't done heavily influenced by business. Professionals and installers are not managed by Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc and they don't assess their work.
-
The devices are not given by the business and the installers and experts utilize their own gear and instruments.
-
The installers and experts are utilized for a specific time-span till the fulfillment of the undertaking and are not utilized for long.
-
The strategy for installment is through a set rate for every venture and not by time-frame.
-
The installers and professionals are authorized and affirmed by the state and are having particular abilities which are not increased through the business.
Every one of these conditions fulfill the necessities of self employed entity as indicated by measures utilized by the courts and doesn't fulfill the standards of representative.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
