1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
8

Please answer this question

History
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
8 0
I believe the answer is federalist. Hope this helped.
You might be interested in
What did Europe’s seas and rivers provide for its people
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

People and goods can sail easily from inland areas to the open sea and, from there, to other parts of the world. Europe's seas and rivers provided protection as well as possibilities for trade. The English Channel, for example, separated the islands of Britain and Ireland from the rest of Europe.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The incan empire was located in the present-day country of _______.
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
rank the party systems including the two party system from most decromatic to least. then write an essay explaining your ranking
grin007 [14]

Explanation: Advantages. Some historians have suggested that two-party systems promote centrism and encourage political parties to find common positions which appeal to wide swaths of the electorate. It can lead to political stability which leads, in turn, to economic growth.

6 0
3 years ago
Which best explains the role the Huns played in Rome’s collapse?
Veseljchak [2.6K]
The answer would be “ The Huns attacked more than seventy cities throughout the empire “
5 0
3 years ago
Why was the decision in Dred Scott v. Stanford so significant?
KIM [24]

Answer:

The Significance of Dred Scott v Sanford is that the decision was a landmark decision during the time, as it delcared that all African-American, regardless of freed or enslaved status, were not to be declared legal citizens of the United States. It also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. While it was intended to settle the slavery debate and tensions going on at the time, it instead deepened tensions between the abolitionist North and pro-slavery South that would eventually lead to Civil War. In contemporary times, Dred Scott is considered one of, if not the worst Supreme Court ruling in the Supreme Courts history.

Explanation:

Hope that helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The figure of Pandora could be best compared to what other figure?
    6·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What eventually happened to Czar Nicholas II and his entire family?
    9·2 answers
  • A major provision of the Radical Republicans’ plan for Reconstruction that Southern States find most objectionable was that a fo
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Spain so strongly Catholic?
    5·1 answer
  • Where is Italy the homeland of the ancient romans on the map
    8·1 answer
  • What is the role of the government in a command economy?
    5·2 answers
  • What are some joe biden qoutes?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the house of representative vote for?
    7·1 answer
  • True or false: The Middle East has high
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!