Using a calculator with the binompdf and binomcdf features, I can calculate these values. My calculator is a TI-83 plus, and the features are found under the 2nd, Vars keys (Scroll up or down until you see them).
If "exactly" is to be found, use binompdf:
binompdf(number of trials, probability of success, exactly number)
ANSWER for exactly 3: binompdf(8, 0.5, 3) = 0.21875 = 21.875%
If "at least" is to be found, use binomcdf:
binomcdf(number of trials, probability of success, at least number - 1)
ANSWER for at least 6: binomcdf(8, 1/2, 5) ≈ 0.8555 ≈ 85.55%
If "at most" is to be found, use binomcdf:
binomcdf(number of trials, probability of success, at most number)
ANSWER for at most 3: binomcdf(8, 0.5, 3) ≈ 0.3633 ≈ 36.33%
No, her time was not faster than either of the two fastest.
27.99 is greater than both 27.97 and 27.93.
Hope this helps you! :)
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
513 = 500 + 10 + 3
The 5 is worth 500.
The 1 is worth 10.
And the 3 is worth 3 !
Answer:
(in step-by-step explanation)
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio x:y is the same as the fraction x/y if that helps, so it is basically putting the coordinates into a fraction. Here is a video that might help also: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-sixth-grade-math/cc-6th-ratios-prop-topic/cc-6th-ratio-word-problems/v/ratios-on-coordinate-plane
Coordinate planes are a way of expressing data, so if it makes it easier, put the data into a ratio! Sorry, it is a bit difficult to explain such a broad question.
It's still 36% because you droppet it and then gain it back up