All categories

3 years ago

A woman who entered the workforce in the 1960s could expect to

2 answers:

8 0

A woman who enrolled in the workforce in the 1960s could anticipate working for male supervisors and managers.

Women in the workforce obtaining salaries are the portion of a contemporary phenomenon, one that originated at the same time as the extension of advanced employment for individuals, but females have been examined by inequality in the workforce.

Further Explanation:

Until contemporary times, legal and cultural traditions, consolidated with the passivity of longstanding spiritual and institutional practices, limited women's admission and cooperation in the workforce. Economic dependence upon men, and consequently the disadvantaged socio-economic situation of males, have had the identical impact, especially as professions have turned to be professionalized during the19th and 20th centuries.

Women's had no admittance to more eminent learning which had dramatically dismissed them of the preparation of well-paid and high-status seizures. The admission of the female into the more distinguished fields like law and doctors was restricted in most nations due to females being refused entry to colleges and requirement for degrees. Women were considerably restricted to low-paid and poor status professions for the utmost of the 19th and 20th centuries or merited more limited earnings than men for performing the identical work.

Learn more:

1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by? brainly.com/question/477236

2. The most influential and powerful members of a political party are most likely found? brainly.com/question/11032918

Answer Details:

Grade: Middle School

Subject: History

Topic: Women in the workforce 1960s

Keywords:

Modern , legal , culture , religious , educational convinces, occupation , medicine , law, nation , university, women , poor , jobs, centuries, workforce.

fgiga [73]3 years ago

6 0

A Woman who entered the workforce in the 1960s could expect to find a lot of difficulties on the way. At that time, women's role in society was still viewed as mainly domestic.

They were expected to get married at a young age, start a family and take care of it at home, while the husband is out making the money. At that time, there were few opportunities for women in the market.

You might be interested in

Icons representing historical figures had specific attributes, so that they could be recognized

Dahasolnce [82]

The answer is true .....

4 0

3 years ago

Which new nation-states were formed in Europe during the 19th century?

kompoz [17]

Answer:

Eight countries—the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia—became members in 2004; Bulgaria and Romania followed in 2007. A Europe of nation-states would be preferable to the disjointed, ineffectual EU of today.

In the 19th century Europe was divided into many different nation states. ... New nationalist states were the result of many wars that broke out thought Europe. Wars such as the Austro-Prussian War in 1852 crushed Austria's influence on nationalism.

Explanation:

<h2>Hope this helps you !! </h2>

7 0

3 years ago

Why did colonists feel the Articles of Confederation were necessary even though the Declaration of Independence was already writ

Finger [1]

D. The Declaration of Independence outlined a relationship between individuals and the government but did not detail the power and control of that government.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was known for its many weaknesses. It gave little to no power to the central government, which made Americans eventually uneasy and lead to the creation of the Declaration of Independence.

The Articles was very weak and granted the central government barely any power that it needed. The government could not tax the states, they had to out right ask the states for money. This lead to the United States not being able to pay off war debts, or other important things that were valuable to keeping up a country. The government also couldn't regulate trade, which was very important during this time and keep up the wealth and importance of the United States. They also couldn't do things such as enforcing laws and passing new laws, they needed many of the states approval before doing anything.

The people who were in support of creating a new constitution were the Federalists, but those who wanted to keep a small government were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were most likely scared of a big government because they didn't want the government to abuse their power. They didn't want a repeat of what happened with Great Britain, with "taxation without representation" and not letting people voice opinions, practice different religions, or pass absurd laws that would overall damage individuals. Federalists felt that keeping the government this way was hurting the United States and they should be represented by a big government, obviously not one that was abusive, but one that could get things done while still having the people in mind.

When the Declaration of Independence was created, most of the people focused on the relationship between the government and the people, as it was a hot topic in the past. Many people wanted to make sure the government would not get out of hand and to maintain the good relationship between having a bigger government and the wishes of the American citizens.

Many people also felt that the Articles of Confederation was still needed, as that properly dictated how much power the government could hold, while the Declaration of Independence mostly focused on the relationship between the individuals and the government.

3 0

3 years ago

How do the choices of ordinary citizens impact a country's history?

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

cuz they can change da world in a good way like setting up an organization for people to donate food to families in need or helping people get transportation these are ways dat people can impact our history I hope dis helps :3

7 0

3 years ago

How did the united states participate in world war 1?

arlik [135]

The U.S. army in Europe was under the command of General John J. Pershing. At first, the U.S. had few trained troops to send over to Europe. However, the army was quickly built up through the draft and volunteers. By the end of the war around 2 million U.S. troops were in France. American troops on way to the front march thru London Source: Department of Defense The U.S. troops arrived just in time to turn the tide of the war in favor of the Allies. Both sides were exhausted and running out of soldiers. The influx of fresh troops helped to boost the morale of the Allies and played a major role in the defeat of the Germans.

8 0

3 years ago