1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natali5045456 [20]
3 years ago
12

Someone who supported ratification of the constitution, believed that the president should have a lot of power, and held a loose

interpretation of the constitution, was most likely a member of which faction? federalists anti-federalists democratic-republican first continental congress
History
1 answer:
baherus [9]3 years ago
5 0
Federalists believed that the central government should be strong and have a lot of power. They held a loose interpretation of the Constitution, meaning they believed that, if the Constitution didn't say you couldn't do something, you could do it.
You might be interested in
Why did British colonists oppose the Wool Act of 1699 and the Iron Act of 1750? They protected the home country’s economy at the
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

<u><em>They protected the home country’s economy at the colonists’ expense</em></u>.

Explanation:

Interestingly this colonist where affected after the Wool Act because it resulted in higher value of British clothes as a result of export ban of foreign wool.

The Iron Act which was meant to increase local iron production was opposed because they were resulting in losses for the growing iron and steel companies.

4 0
3 years ago
how did the kennedy administration know that the soviet union was putting ballistic missiles in cuba?
Komok [63]
1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
3 0
3 years ago
How did the goals of the french in north america differ from the goals of other european nations ?
astra-53 [7]

The French looked at America as a place to fish and hunt which other Europeans looked at it as a place to settle. As opposed to settling, like many other Europeans, the French  wanted to use America to sell fur and make a profit from it

6 0
3 years ago
Summarize Albert Fall’s role in the Teapot Dome scandal.​
zimovet [89]

Answer:The Teapot Dome scandal was a bribery scandal involving the administration of United States President Warren G. Harding from 1921 to 1923. ... Convicted of accepting bribes from the oil companies, Fall became the first presidential cabinet member to go to prison; no one was convicted of paying the bribes.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
True or false: Even though lower-class Americans constitute a larger share of the American population today, their share of the
OLga [1]

Their share of the nation's income being much smaller than it was in 1970

is True.

In the 1970s , the lower class American's income was around 62 percent and

this has dropped to around 41 percent in recent times. The higher class

American's income however increased during the same period of time.

This is as a result of the increase in economic inequality of the country in

which the disparity between the income of the lower and higher class is very

wide.

Read more on brainly.com/question/19302129

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Geographic _________ reveals the placement of something over a given space.
    14·1 answer
  • In Norway, President Clinton tried to negotiate an end to conflicts between the Palestinians and the _____.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a benefit of the Sumerian writing system?
    9·2 answers
  • True or False: Peasants could work their way up the social ladder in the feudal system.
    13·2 answers
  • What was the central purpose of the Taika reforms of 646 in Japan?
    15·1 answer
  • How were popular religious beliefs of medieval Europe different from those at the start of the Scientific Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • Read the passage about Charlayne Hunter-Gault’s experiences.
    13·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    5·2 answers
  • 40 POINTS:
    12·1 answer
  • What made the colonists realize it was time (during the summer of 1776) to declare their independence
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!