Answer:
Strong positive
Explanation:
In studies, we usually establish relationships between two or more variables using correlations. Correlations tell us how this variables are related.
- Two variables have a positive correlation when if one increases the other increases too.
- Two variables have a negative correlation when if one increases the other decreases and vice versa.
Also, a correlation can be weak, moderate or strong. Researchers agree that a correlation that is larger than 0.70 should be considered a strong correlation.
In this example Isabella reads about a study saying there's a correlation coefficient of +0.85 between hours spent studying and final exam grade. <u>The fact that the sign of this correlation is "+" tells us that it is positive</u> (the more hours spent studying, the better final exam grade). We can also see that <u>the coefficient is 0.85 which is greater than 0.70 and therefore we can consider this correlation as a strong one.</u>
Thus, Isabella would conclude that this is a strong positive relationship.
1) yes
2) i have but decided, it could arguable be a bland taco if you think about it
3) at LEAST 5
4) Chungus or Derek
5)idk probably wifi
Money, while it cannot buy happiness, is an important means to achieving higher living standards. In Portugal, the average household net-adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 20 519 a year, lower than the OECD average of USD 30 563 a year.
<u>This is false.</u>
Individuals know stealing isn't right, yet they do it as a result of psychological mechanisms, for example, motivated blindness.
"Motivated blindness" alludes to the human propensity to neglect data that neutralizes what individuals need to accept, either in light of the fact that the conviction is to their greatest advantage or just on the grounds that they have held the conviction quite a while and they are candidly put resources into holding it. The human personality is modified to specifically observe prove supporting the ends it might want to reach, while it has a tendency to overlook or rebate confirm that conflicts with its previous inclinations.
Answer: B) Officer Martin may search the house in which the arrest occurred.
Explanation:
If the suspect is legally arrested, the police may search the suspect and the area in the immediate control and the entire place where the suspect was found during an arrest. No warrant is required to search the evidences. Also, the area must be legally seized so as to observed it again so that potential evidences can also be found after arrest.
The officer Martin who obtains an arrest warrant for Sam can conduct a search in Martin house without the search warrant. This is because the suspect is expected to have the tangible or destroyed evidences related to the case may be hidden in the Martin house.
