Answer: These sources provided Shakespeare primarily with historical information. Moreover, Shakespeare borrowed ideas for the plot from them, and focused on some of the historical figures in his own work.
Explanation:
Not all of Shakespeare's ideas are his own. Sometimes, Shakespeare found inspiration in other sources that he used. This is mainly true for his history plays - plays that are named after monarchs that ruled during a certain time period. <em>Holinshed's Chronicles</em> is believed to have been his primary source for history plays - <em>Henry IV</em> (part I and II),<em> Henry V, Henry VI</em> (all three parts), <em>Henry VIII, Richard II, Richard III</em>, but also for <em>King Lear</em>, <em>Cymbeline</em> and <em>Macbeth</em>. Shakespeare incorporated many Roman figures in his work, such as Julius Caesar, Antony, Cleopatra, etc. While doing so, he mainly relied on <em>Plutarch's</em> work, a text called <em>Parallel Lives</em> that consists of 40 biographies of Greek and Roman leaders.
Answer: The 1960s were a decade of revolution and change in politics, music and society around the world. ... The 1960s were an era of protest. In the civil rights movement blacks and whites protested against the unfair treatment of races. Towards the end of the decade more and more Americans protested against the war in Vietnam.
Early civilizations were ancient and did not
have great technologies and the knowledge and help the early colonists of the
Americas got from the Europeans.
Here
are plenty of reasons that could justify referring to these civilizations as
distinct from other peoples. What really distinguishes the Aztecs, the Mayans,
the Apachee tribes and others, from the rest of the world, is that they were
confined within an area that kept them from interacting with the Europeans, the
Asians, and the Africans, and thus spreading their culture there. That led to
the isolation of the people in the Americas, resulting to their civilizations
being seemingly 'prehistoric'. What I mean by that is that they couldn't have
access to materials that would in turn allow them to use more advanced
technology. While they did have plenty of chocolate, there are other things
that they definitely lacked, and as such we can see that their weapons were
inadequate, and in comparison to those of the Europeans, they were petty. It's
also noteworthy that there were no longer horses in the Americas, seeing as
they had all died out. The first horse that arrived in the continent, after a
long time, belonged to the Spanish armada. This is the most significant reason
as to how the civilizations in America were different than those in the rest of
the world. While I can name other reasons, such as distinctly different
architecture, different cuisine, way of life, etc., these are not as noteworthy
as the previous reasons that I named.
<span> </span>
