The difference between ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense is related to the scope of events. In a situation of ensuring domestic tranquility, the US government has a duty to maintain peace within the country's borders.
Providing common defense refers to plans and actions to keep the nation safe from foreign threats, through an effective national army ready to defend the country under any circumstances.
<h3 /><h3>What is the need to promote national security?</h3>
It is essential for the maintenance of a safe country, where each citizen has their human and civil rights protected, by measures and actions of the country's leaders in favor of peace and the quality of life of its citizens.
Therefore, ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense are duties of the government of a country, which must be ready to protect the country from threats that jeopardize its security and sovereignty.
Find out more about National Security here:
brainly.com/question/25375059
#SPJ1
Answer:
Responsibility is doing the right thing at the right time and at the right place.
Explanation:
when you choose to do what you are needed to do at the right time and at the right place it means you are responsible.
Answer: It sharply decreased and suffered heavy losses.
Explanation:
Tobacco, like most industries in America, saw its prices plummet and farmers take heavy losses. Before the Depression, farmers had tried to capitalize on the prosperity of the 20s by producing a lot of tobacco. So much so that they overproduced and tobacco prices fell before the Depression.
When the Depression then came, they fell even harder. Tobacco was traded was 86 cents a pound in 1919 was trading for 9 cents in 1931. Sometimes farmers did not even make enough to justify the cost of production. This went on till some government policies enacted by Roosevelt with the New Deal.
Provided railroad companies land free of charge.
In order to help expand railroads throughout the country after the civil war, congress made railroads expand significantly; bringing even remote parts of the country into a national market economy.
Answer:
While the idea of a new world order was sound in principle, it did not address the power or economic differences that existed around the globe. It also did not address how global issues such as climate change and how the emergence of the Internet and social media might create conflict around the world.
Explanation:
sample answer