<u>Answer:</u>
Information on them is often not backed up with reliable sources.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Crowd-sourced websites are open for everyone to feed information to. Most of the people who feed this information do not fetch it from sources that are authentic and reliable.
- They either try to put up their personal experiences or the information they heard somewhere, someday.
- Very few who genuinely understand the importance of the correctness of information take efforts to look up for the information through reliable sources to answer the queries and questions.
Answer: B. The US government exempted the Amish, who do not believe in government assistance, from paying Social Security taxes.
Alexis de Tocqueville's concern for liberty had to do with personal liberties -- with freedom of conscience and belief being protected in a constitutional republic. By respecting the rights of the Amish to exempt themselves from the Social Security system, the government of the United States is allowing them to have liberty of their beliefs. They don't pay into the Social Security system, and also do not receive benefits from it. They choose to care for themselves and one another in the Amish community.
Alexis de Tocqueville's famous work was published in the 1830s. Based on his travels in the early United States, he wrote <em>Democracy in America, </em>in which he detailed how a democratic society functions.
The correct answer is Stomach Cancer
According to numerous research and empirical evidence found in that research, acculturation of Japanese in the United States led to the reduction of stomach cancer in people. This was a result of different eating habits that came with immigration and that influenced one another and caused people's stomachs to react differently to various foods.
Answer:
Explanation:
As an organized movement, trade unionism (also called organized labor) originated in the 19th century in Great Britain, continental Europe, and the United States. In many countries trade unionism is synonymous with the term labor movement. Smaller associations of workers started appearing in Britain in the 18th century, but they remained sporadic and short-lived through most of the 19th century, in<u> part because of the hostility they encountered from employers and government groups</u> that resented this new form of political and economic activism. At that time unions and unionists were regularly prosecuted under various restraint-of-trade and conspiracy statutes in both Britain and the United States.
While union organizers in both countries faced similar obstacles, their approaches evolved quite differently: the British movement favored political activism, which led to the formation of the Labor Party in 1906, while <u>American unions pursued collective bargaining as a means of winning economic gains for their workers.</u>
<u></u>
<u>In the United States the labor movement was also adversely affected by the movement to implement so-called right-to-work laws, which generally prohibited the union shop, a formerly common clause of labor contracts that required workers to join, or pay service fees to, a union as a condition of employment.</u> Right-to-work laws, which had been adopted in more than half of U.S. states and the territory of Guam by the early 21st century, were promoted by economic libertarians, trade associations, and corporate-funded think tanks as necessary to protect the economic liberty and freedom of association of workers. They had the practical effect of weakening collective bargaining and limiting the political activities of unions by depriving them of funds. Certain other states adopted separate legislation to limit or prohibit collective bargaining or the right to strike by public-sector unions. In Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (2018), the U.S. Supreme Court held that public employees cannot be required to pay service fees to a union to support its collective-bargaining activities on their behalf.
Answer:
established that all of humanity would be guarded by an international legal shield and that even a head of state would be held criminally responsible and punished for aggression and crimes against humanity
